![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Tagelmust page were merged into Litham#Tagelmust on 3 August 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This page was mentioned in the Acknowledgements section of the 2007 Queensland Core Skills Test Short Response Paper. That is a statewide, very important test, so I thought it was worthy of some sort of thing on this talk page.
Interestingly, there was a typo. The note was:
"Wikipedia, for an adapted photograph from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabelmust, accessed March 2007"
That page doesn't exist, and the picture is on this page.
I wonder if improper citation is a breach of the license it's under :D
Joeldipops 04:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I've just got rid of this picture from the article for two reasons:
If anybody can see a reason why that pic should be there, feel free to stick it back in--as it stands at the moment, I just think it looks amateurish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.27.130.200 ( talk) 01:02, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
The artice has its {{Hats}} http, but does not appear in the boxed listing. Wetman ( talk) 01:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Tagelmust page were merged into Litham#Tagelmust on 3 August 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This page was mentioned in the Acknowledgements section of the 2007 Queensland Core Skills Test Short Response Paper. That is a statewide, very important test, so I thought it was worthy of some sort of thing on this talk page.
Interestingly, there was a typo. The note was:
"Wikipedia, for an adapted photograph from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabelmust, accessed March 2007"
That page doesn't exist, and the picture is on this page.
I wonder if improper citation is a breach of the license it's under :D
Joeldipops 04:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I've just got rid of this picture from the article for two reasons:
If anybody can see a reason why that pic should be there, feel free to stick it back in--as it stands at the moment, I just think it looks amateurish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.27.130.200 ( talk) 01:02, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
The artice has its {{Hats}} http, but does not appear in the boxed listing. Wetman ( talk) 01:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)