This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This is more a piece of advertisement than anything else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.76.197.9 ( talk • contribs) 8 January 2007
Not only is this article written like an advertisement, it's highly slanted (I suspect the TAGES company may have had a hand).
The TAGES System can be fairly easily circumvented either by using a fixed .EXE file, or a CD Drive emulation system. Also, it is fairly well documented.
http://www.cdfreaks.com/news/TAGES-launches-new-commercial-site-including-funny-quotes.html makes fo an interesting read, as it shows the TAGES company has a history of misrepresenting their products, and cherry-picking claims for use in advertiments.
I wrote this article almost entirely. I have no connections to TAGES SA whatsoever, also check my IP, it is Israeli - while TAGES SA is a French company. I just find the software security industry interesting, that is it. Advertisement? please prove so before bringing up baseless speculations.
I have edited the article and believe it has now reached NPOV. Nikos 21:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
There might be a few more things to edit such as the company quotes to make it more neutral. Quotes and be references instead in the form of links JasonHockeyGuy ( talk) 22:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
On Bittorrent theres a cracked version of Arthur and the Minimoys which uses Tages and VFS.
So Tages has already been broken by hacker groups.
Can anyone put that in wikipedia, cause tages had been broken.
another flawed copy protection scheme. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.148.148.124 ( talk) 01:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
BTW, do you understand the notion of "programming" at all? // The original author of this article.
But I was not successful so I put the spam tag on it, had no choice but to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JasonHockeyGuy ( talk • contribs) 18:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Before it said "the copy protection system deleted NPCs from the game" which is of course mince. It's the game developers who caused the NPCs to be deleted. It also wasn't clear that the next sentence (the one talking about false positives) therefore meant the game was silently triggering this behaviour. Reworded to make clear. For what it's worth, tages claim on their webpage not to do blacklisting of emulator products; I'm not qualified to determine the truthfulness of that (or whether it only applies to their new products and not old ones, or whatever) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.11.155 ( talk) 03:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
I am the original author of this article, written two years ago. I will no longer contribute to wikipedia due to the ongoing abuse of my work. Goodbye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.179.124.95 ( talk) 17:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Providing information about means available for protection circumvention does not, and can not, consitute constuctive editing. As I said in the previous disputes - people are quick to praise open source software, but are trigger-happy regarding DRM.
Yes, this time I am serious about leaving. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.179.24.189 ( talk) 15:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Please read WP:RS. A forum is not a reliable source, ever, ever, and ever. I really need to exercise more due diligence in policing such articles. hbdragon88 ( talk) 05:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Seriously, can't you see that everyone should just agree with him? What is this thing, some sort of exercise in socialism or something? This guy wrote this article 27 years ago in a single titanic act of transcendent Truth and all you morons clearly don't know what you're talking about, so Mr. 79.179.124.95 should be the final arbiter of truth on this subject, and who are you anyway to edit what he wrote? He's some random IP address somewhere and he SAYS he's unbaised and that's good enough for me, why do you people always have to nitpick about "neutrality" and "factual criticisms", can't you see you're making someone on the internet upset? So upset that he doesn't just leave, he ANNOUNCES that he's leaving! Only people who are Really Important announce they're leaving, so this guy MUST be really important! Someone track this guy down and tell him to come back, wikipedia desperately needs more giant egos to get into pointless edit wars about unpopular copy protection schemes! P.S. if anyone deletes this edit I will TOTALLY write an angry comment about leaving. Possibly several times, in case the first one doesn't make you feel enough remorse, though I can hardly see how it couldn't. I'll make a separate heading and everything, in case you guys want to discuss it for a while or something. Don't worry, I won't actually leave, I'll obsessively come back and check on it just to make sure you're really sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.168.18 ( talk) 05:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
"The Tagès copy protection system is incompatible with multiple versions of the Microsoft Windows operating system, and is employed on CD and DVD discs."
Should that read "... is compatible with multiple versions ..." instead of incompatible? Or is this software I really don't want on my PC? 94.30.69.91 ( talk) 16:42, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Tagès. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Maybe add a list of games that use Tages or SolidShield as it's now apparently called? Source: PCGamingWiki
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This is more a piece of advertisement than anything else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.76.197.9 ( talk • contribs) 8 January 2007
Not only is this article written like an advertisement, it's highly slanted (I suspect the TAGES company may have had a hand).
The TAGES System can be fairly easily circumvented either by using a fixed .EXE file, or a CD Drive emulation system. Also, it is fairly well documented.
http://www.cdfreaks.com/news/TAGES-launches-new-commercial-site-including-funny-quotes.html makes fo an interesting read, as it shows the TAGES company has a history of misrepresenting their products, and cherry-picking claims for use in advertiments.
I wrote this article almost entirely. I have no connections to TAGES SA whatsoever, also check my IP, it is Israeli - while TAGES SA is a French company. I just find the software security industry interesting, that is it. Advertisement? please prove so before bringing up baseless speculations.
I have edited the article and believe it has now reached NPOV. Nikos 21:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
There might be a few more things to edit such as the company quotes to make it more neutral. Quotes and be references instead in the form of links JasonHockeyGuy ( talk) 22:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
On Bittorrent theres a cracked version of Arthur and the Minimoys which uses Tages and VFS.
So Tages has already been broken by hacker groups.
Can anyone put that in wikipedia, cause tages had been broken.
another flawed copy protection scheme. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.148.148.124 ( talk) 01:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
BTW, do you understand the notion of "programming" at all? // The original author of this article.
But I was not successful so I put the spam tag on it, had no choice but to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JasonHockeyGuy ( talk • contribs) 18:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Before it said "the copy protection system deleted NPCs from the game" which is of course mince. It's the game developers who caused the NPCs to be deleted. It also wasn't clear that the next sentence (the one talking about false positives) therefore meant the game was silently triggering this behaviour. Reworded to make clear. For what it's worth, tages claim on their webpage not to do blacklisting of emulator products; I'm not qualified to determine the truthfulness of that (or whether it only applies to their new products and not old ones, or whatever) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.11.155 ( talk) 03:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
I am the original author of this article, written two years ago. I will no longer contribute to wikipedia due to the ongoing abuse of my work. Goodbye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.179.124.95 ( talk) 17:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Providing information about means available for protection circumvention does not, and can not, consitute constuctive editing. As I said in the previous disputes - people are quick to praise open source software, but are trigger-happy regarding DRM.
Yes, this time I am serious about leaving. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.179.24.189 ( talk) 15:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Please read WP:RS. A forum is not a reliable source, ever, ever, and ever. I really need to exercise more due diligence in policing such articles. hbdragon88 ( talk) 05:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Seriously, can't you see that everyone should just agree with him? What is this thing, some sort of exercise in socialism or something? This guy wrote this article 27 years ago in a single titanic act of transcendent Truth and all you morons clearly don't know what you're talking about, so Mr. 79.179.124.95 should be the final arbiter of truth on this subject, and who are you anyway to edit what he wrote? He's some random IP address somewhere and he SAYS he's unbaised and that's good enough for me, why do you people always have to nitpick about "neutrality" and "factual criticisms", can't you see you're making someone on the internet upset? So upset that he doesn't just leave, he ANNOUNCES that he's leaving! Only people who are Really Important announce they're leaving, so this guy MUST be really important! Someone track this guy down and tell him to come back, wikipedia desperately needs more giant egos to get into pointless edit wars about unpopular copy protection schemes! P.S. if anyone deletes this edit I will TOTALLY write an angry comment about leaving. Possibly several times, in case the first one doesn't make you feel enough remorse, though I can hardly see how it couldn't. I'll make a separate heading and everything, in case you guys want to discuss it for a while or something. Don't worry, I won't actually leave, I'll obsessively come back and check on it just to make sure you're really sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.168.18 ( talk) 05:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
"The Tagès copy protection system is incompatible with multiple versions of the Microsoft Windows operating system, and is employed on CD and DVD discs."
Should that read "... is compatible with multiple versions ..." instead of incompatible? Or is this software I really don't want on my PC? 94.30.69.91 ( talk) 16:42, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Tagès. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Maybe add a list of games that use Tages or SolidShield as it's now apparently called? Source: PCGamingWiki