Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
I will be reviewing this article over the next several days. The version I will be reviewing is this one, and subsequent changes will not form a part of the initial review. Regards, SBC-YPR ( talk) 06:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
As a result of the above, I have placed the article on hold for a period of one week, after which I will take a look at it again and accordingly pass or fail the article. Please feel free to contact me for any clarifications. Regards,
SBC-YPR (
talk)
11:23, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Congratulations on an excellent copyedit on the suggestions provided. I have now passed the article as a GA, and listed it as such on the Good Articles page under Philosophy and religion. For the record, User:Muhammad Hamza contributed significantly to this GA pass (with five or more major edits during the GA review process).
For futher improvement in the future, I would suggest that the article be peer reviewed a second time for obtain suggestions to meet requirements of comprehensiveness and high-quality sourcing, before an FA review is attempted. All the best! Regards, SBC-YPR ( talk) 07:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
I will be reviewing this article over the next several days. The version I will be reviewing is this one, and subsequent changes will not form a part of the initial review. Regards, SBC-YPR ( talk) 06:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
As a result of the above, I have placed the article on hold for a period of one week, after which I will take a look at it again and accordingly pass or fail the article. Please feel free to contact me for any clarifications. Regards,
SBC-YPR (
talk)
11:23, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Congratulations on an excellent copyedit on the suggestions provided. I have now passed the article as a GA, and listed it as such on the Good Articles page under Philosophy and religion. For the record, User:Muhammad Hamza contributed significantly to this GA pass (with five or more major edits during the GA review process).
For futher improvement in the future, I would suggest that the article be peer reviewed a second time for obtain suggestions to meet requirements of comprehensiveness and high-quality sourcing, before an FA review is attempted. All the best! Regards, SBC-YPR ( talk) 07:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)