This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tablighi Jamaat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Tablighi Jamaat was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Tablikhi Jamaat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chanakya11neeti ( talk • contribs) 12:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
The "Explanation for any connection [to extremism]" section lacks focus. It has become a jumbled dumping ground for criticism. The statements made there largely aren't explanations for connections.
The section's introductory sentence attributes what follows to four people, but many of the 19 sources cited thereafter are not by those people or about their work. It says "by the fact that", but much of what follows is opinion. "In addition", "thus", "despite", and similar connectors are used between unrelated thoughts. In several cases direct quotations are followed by citations of multiple sources, most of which do not contain the quotation.
The section needs extensive cleanup, removal of poor quality sources, reorganization, and trimming of off-topic material. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 19:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
মঞ্জিল আর দুয়া 103.67.158.232 ( talk) 04:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tablighi Jamaat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Tablighi Jamaat was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Tablikhi Jamaat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chanakya11neeti ( talk • contribs) 12:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
The "Explanation for any connection [to extremism]" section lacks focus. It has become a jumbled dumping ground for criticism. The statements made there largely aren't explanations for connections.
The section's introductory sentence attributes what follows to four people, but many of the 19 sources cited thereafter are not by those people or about their work. It says "by the fact that", but much of what follows is opinion. "In addition", "thus", "despite", and similar connectors are used between unrelated thoughts. In several cases direct quotations are followed by citations of multiple sources, most of which do not contain the quotation.
The section needs extensive cleanup, removal of poor quality sources, reorganization, and trimming of off-topic material. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 19:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
মঞ্জিল আর দুয়া 103.67.158.232 ( talk) 04:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)