This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I seriously question the notability of this EAF when "the development started in 2009" as the article states. Wikipedia is not a forum where every new development in the field can be introduced. -- Mdd ( talk) 23:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Wikitect, you must have noticed I have rearranged some of the article and now I have restored the primary sources-tag. Almost all of the sources still seem to be primary sources. If this would be a Wikibooks article, this wouldn't be so much of a problem, but Wikipedia articles do need independent sources confirming it's notability. -- Mdd ( talk) 01:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Sorry but I think you've missed my point. I understand what a reliable third party source is but I don't see what part(s) of the TRAK article require such sources. You don't need another source to establish either that TRAK exists or that it is structured in the way described. The only statement(s) which seem to require support are those wrt being developed within London Underground and sponsored by the Department for Transport. It would help if you could identify the particular parts that need sources. Wikitect ( talk) 20:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
In support of the Wikitect here, the following is a summary of a comment from a recent INCOSE UK Architecture Working Group Meeting (AWG): "From the outset TRAK has been designed to be compliant with ISO / IET 42010 Standard and has provided an invaluable and yet fortuate testbed on which to iron out problems with the Standard as it approaches its formal release post FCD" As such - in addition to TRAK being used on a major London Underground Project it is helping in debugging a major international standard on Systems / Software Architecture Description. The INCOSE UK AWG has taken an action to provide a reference to this effect on its website - but this may take a few weeks to sort out. (Brian H - INCOSE UK AWG Secretary)
The logic of this separate set of links isn't clear. External to what - what is the point of reference? Since the formal definition of TRAK is held by 3 separate SourceForge project sites (Overall = trak, Viewpoints = trakviewpoints, Metamodel = trakmetamodel) there is no one singluar 'TRAK site' which which everything else may be considered to be external. It is also inconsistent with the way in which links for other architecture frameworks are treated.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I seriously question the notability of this EAF when "the development started in 2009" as the article states. Wikipedia is not a forum where every new development in the field can be introduced. -- Mdd ( talk) 23:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Wikitect, you must have noticed I have rearranged some of the article and now I have restored the primary sources-tag. Almost all of the sources still seem to be primary sources. If this would be a Wikibooks article, this wouldn't be so much of a problem, but Wikipedia articles do need independent sources confirming it's notability. -- Mdd ( talk) 01:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Sorry but I think you've missed my point. I understand what a reliable third party source is but I don't see what part(s) of the TRAK article require such sources. You don't need another source to establish either that TRAK exists or that it is structured in the way described. The only statement(s) which seem to require support are those wrt being developed within London Underground and sponsored by the Department for Transport. It would help if you could identify the particular parts that need sources. Wikitect ( talk) 20:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
In support of the Wikitect here, the following is a summary of a comment from a recent INCOSE UK Architecture Working Group Meeting (AWG): "From the outset TRAK has been designed to be compliant with ISO / IET 42010 Standard and has provided an invaluable and yet fortuate testbed on which to iron out problems with the Standard as it approaches its formal release post FCD" As such - in addition to TRAK being used on a major London Underground Project it is helping in debugging a major international standard on Systems / Software Architecture Description. The INCOSE UK AWG has taken an action to provide a reference to this effect on its website - but this may take a few weeks to sort out. (Brian H - INCOSE UK AWG Secretary)
The logic of this separate set of links isn't clear. External to what - what is the point of reference? Since the formal definition of TRAK is held by 3 separate SourceForge project sites (Overall = trak, Viewpoints = trakviewpoints, Metamodel = trakmetamodel) there is no one singluar 'TRAK site' which which everything else may be considered to be external. It is also inconsistent with the way in which links for other architecture frameworks are treated.