![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I like to move this to TNC connector to match BNC connector. Those are the terms in common use. -- agr 04:43, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
I've moved the page, per the above request. - GTBacchus( talk) 21:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Need to reflect the FACT that 75 ohm variation exists, even though it is less common in use today. I still sell them to the military for repairs on older equipment still in use...
Why does the TNC outperform BNC ? Looking at the mechanics, inner conductor, die electric and the fingering (all of which make up the electrical path) appear to be identical. Surely the mechanical attachment (threaded TNC, bayonet BNC) should have very little to do with performance.
http://www.amphenolconnex.com/products/bnc.asp -- 11GHz
http://www.amphenolconnex.com/products/tnc.asp -- 11GHz
Thought, comments, observations please. I have been pondering this one for a while now. Markaren1 09:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
My internet router has a TNC connector on it. I purchased an antenna to boost it's range, and it's called a "type N". When I look at the N connector article, I find a connector that looks the same, does the same thing, and was invented by the same person at the same time. Soooo, is there any difference or are these the same thing? Maury Markowitz ( talk) 17:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
I suggest removing the retail uses section. This list only covers a fraction of 1% of the companies that use or have used TNC connectors, and adds nothing to the body of knowledge. Fancy listing companies that have used an IEC power connector, or an M3 screw "Dell once used them to hold a PC case closed, Ford uses them in their engines, Coca-cola uses them in their machines to wash bottles..." really.
Comments? Thomasonline ( talk) 07:20, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
I have removed the Retail Uses section. Thomasonline ( talk) 15:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I like to move this to TNC connector to match BNC connector. Those are the terms in common use. -- agr 04:43, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
I've moved the page, per the above request. - GTBacchus( talk) 21:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Need to reflect the FACT that 75 ohm variation exists, even though it is less common in use today. I still sell them to the military for repairs on older equipment still in use...
Why does the TNC outperform BNC ? Looking at the mechanics, inner conductor, die electric and the fingering (all of which make up the electrical path) appear to be identical. Surely the mechanical attachment (threaded TNC, bayonet BNC) should have very little to do with performance.
http://www.amphenolconnex.com/products/bnc.asp -- 11GHz
http://www.amphenolconnex.com/products/tnc.asp -- 11GHz
Thought, comments, observations please. I have been pondering this one for a while now. Markaren1 09:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
My internet router has a TNC connector on it. I purchased an antenna to boost it's range, and it's called a "type N". When I look at the N connector article, I find a connector that looks the same, does the same thing, and was invented by the same person at the same time. Soooo, is there any difference or are these the same thing? Maury Markowitz ( talk) 17:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
I suggest removing the retail uses section. This list only covers a fraction of 1% of the companies that use or have used TNC connectors, and adds nothing to the body of knowledge. Fancy listing companies that have used an IEC power connector, or an M3 screw "Dell once used them to hold a PC case closed, Ford uses them in their engines, Coca-cola uses them in their machines to wash bottles..." really.
Comments? Thomasonline ( talk) 07:20, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
I have removed the Retail Uses section. Thomasonline ( talk) 15:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)