This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Links should be reserved for significant sites related to TI calculators only. The URL above also seems to have been removed. TI-42 Plus ( talk) 18:37, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
To make it clear to whomever added "Series and the TI-84": The 84 is in the 83 series. I'm not going to revert that, but the calculators are essentially the same. -- Andy Janata 4 July 2005 15:48 (UTC)
TiCalc.org no longer points to a useful site, so I have removed its link in the TI-83 series article - Chrono 04:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone know what type of port the "Link port" is? It look's like a 2,5mm jack or even 3,5mm... but I find it unlikely that it is. [— User:Aphex]
What are the sources for the tech specs? Because they don't agree with the specs at http://www.ticalc.org/basics/calculators/ti-83plus.html —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Treasuretron ( talk • contribs) 21:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC).
Do you mean the 24 vs. 32 KB RAM and 160 vs. 512 KB Flash ROM? The page here on Wiki gives the hardware specs, ticalc tells what is available to the user. Technically (no pun intended) those specs are correct, but I don't mind doing a rewrite to make it correct and clear (such as on the TI-86 page, including 'user-accessible' everywhere it is appropriate). That would be quite a major edit, so I'll wait until someone agrees with me before actually doing it. RobVW 17:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I think that as long as you specified what is user-accessible and what isn't, and edit will be fine. Threefingeredguy 10:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
I have found no links regarding C Programmin on the 83 series. Are you sure this is possible? 24.247.9.25 22:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
How come my TI-83 can write in lowercase by pressing Alpha twice, but no one else's can? It's not a casemodded TI-89, and when i press it twice it ghanges from an uppercase A to a lowercase a. I can then write in full lowercase. Why? ~~mcfaddenator~~
ive got a TI-83 plus (regular edition) that i could take a picture of. unless anyone thinks that 3 pics would be too much Connör 05:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
This section at the bottom about the TI-83 not being compatible with calculators designed for college calculus classes does not cite any sources, and just doesn't make sense. Why isn't it compatible? And if this is true then what calculators were the author comparing it to that are designed for college calculus courses? I've taken Calc 1-3, at more than one school, and the TI-83/83 Plus was the standard calculator...and furthermore, the TI-89 was explicitly not allowed. The only course I took in which the professor wanted us to use the TI-89 instead was differential equations. Although it has been a couple of years since I was in school, I still doubt this statement. Dstroma ( talk) 04:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Did the 83, 84, or any of the TI calcs have internal development "codenames" at TI, like the codenames for Windows versions? -- 75.163.175.29 ( talk) 03:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Links should be reserved for significant sites related to TI calculators only. The URL above also seems to have been removed. TI-42 Plus ( talk) 18:37, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
To make it clear to whomever added "Series and the TI-84": The 84 is in the 83 series. I'm not going to revert that, but the calculators are essentially the same. -- Andy Janata 4 July 2005 15:48 (UTC)
TiCalc.org no longer points to a useful site, so I have removed its link in the TI-83 series article - Chrono 04:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone know what type of port the "Link port" is? It look's like a 2,5mm jack or even 3,5mm... but I find it unlikely that it is. [— User:Aphex]
What are the sources for the tech specs? Because they don't agree with the specs at http://www.ticalc.org/basics/calculators/ti-83plus.html —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Treasuretron ( talk • contribs) 21:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC).
Do you mean the 24 vs. 32 KB RAM and 160 vs. 512 KB Flash ROM? The page here on Wiki gives the hardware specs, ticalc tells what is available to the user. Technically (no pun intended) those specs are correct, but I don't mind doing a rewrite to make it correct and clear (such as on the TI-86 page, including 'user-accessible' everywhere it is appropriate). That would be quite a major edit, so I'll wait until someone agrees with me before actually doing it. RobVW 17:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I think that as long as you specified what is user-accessible and what isn't, and edit will be fine. Threefingeredguy 10:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
I have found no links regarding C Programmin on the 83 series. Are you sure this is possible? 24.247.9.25 22:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
How come my TI-83 can write in lowercase by pressing Alpha twice, but no one else's can? It's not a casemodded TI-89, and when i press it twice it ghanges from an uppercase A to a lowercase a. I can then write in full lowercase. Why? ~~mcfaddenator~~
ive got a TI-83 plus (regular edition) that i could take a picture of. unless anyone thinks that 3 pics would be too much Connör 05:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
This section at the bottom about the TI-83 not being compatible with calculators designed for college calculus classes does not cite any sources, and just doesn't make sense. Why isn't it compatible? And if this is true then what calculators were the author comparing it to that are designed for college calculus courses? I've taken Calc 1-3, at more than one school, and the TI-83/83 Plus was the standard calculator...and furthermore, the TI-89 was explicitly not allowed. The only course I took in which the professor wanted us to use the TI-89 instead was differential equations. Although it has been a couple of years since I was in school, I still doubt this statement. Dstroma ( talk) 04:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Did the 83, 84, or any of the TI calcs have internal development "codenames" at TI, like the codenames for Windows versions? -- 75.163.175.29 ( talk) 03:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)