Infobox title of the attraction is not in italics, unlike the rest of the mentions.
WikiProject Amusement Parks had a discussion a while back and we agreed that italics shouldn't be used for the ride that the article is about so I removed the italics.--
Dom497 (
talk)
12:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Well the film infobox was causing the italics in the title. I have restored the italics in this case because T2 3-D: Battle Across Time is the name of a film and I believe
MOS:ITALIC would take precedence over the WikiProject. Themeparkgc Talk 23:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
If the lead is a summary, why the one odd reference [4]? This can be placed in the main article where you expand on the lead.
"It was previously at Universal Studios Hollywood." the sentence before you said there were multiple attractions, are you saying that it was launched at Universal, then versions appeared elsewhere?
Finding stats on visitors is very hard to come by. Almost all the amusement park/ride GA's don't have stats on visitors.--
Dom497 (
talk)
01:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC)reply
It has a 4D films template and a 4D category but no mention of 4D in the article.
"where live performers interact with a 3-D film" - Isn't it common sense that this statement = 4D? However, I'm not to certain if this ride is really 4D anyways. Please see my comment at the very bottom.--
Dom497 (
talk)
18:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
I have refocused that template because I'm skeptical that a couple of the other attractions should be considered 4D too. So now, we have 3D and 4D films at Universal Orlando
Going back to "making it the most expensive film per minute", what is the context? Is it the most expensive film in the history of movies, for example?
Just re-check the numerous red links, can any of them be turned blue by creating stubs? Can any of them be unlinked as they'd be unlikely to meet the notability requirements for Wikipedia in the short term?
Image licences seem fine to me, although the image of the pre-show room is a little odd, not particularly enlightening and of low quality, is it really helpful?
@
The Rambling Man: I'm leaving to go on a vacation on Sunday so I not be able to address any more comments. I have emailed the nominator to see if he can come to finish addressing the issues and determine if this ride is 3D or 4D.--
Dom497 (
talk)
18:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Infobox title of the attraction is not in italics, unlike the rest of the mentions.
WikiProject Amusement Parks had a discussion a while back and we agreed that italics shouldn't be used for the ride that the article is about so I removed the italics.--
Dom497 (
talk)
12:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Well the film infobox was causing the italics in the title. I have restored the italics in this case because T2 3-D: Battle Across Time is the name of a film and I believe
MOS:ITALIC would take precedence over the WikiProject. Themeparkgc Talk 23:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
If the lead is a summary, why the one odd reference [4]? This can be placed in the main article where you expand on the lead.
"It was previously at Universal Studios Hollywood." the sentence before you said there were multiple attractions, are you saying that it was launched at Universal, then versions appeared elsewhere?
Finding stats on visitors is very hard to come by. Almost all the amusement park/ride GA's don't have stats on visitors.--
Dom497 (
talk)
01:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC)reply
It has a 4D films template and a 4D category but no mention of 4D in the article.
"where live performers interact with a 3-D film" - Isn't it common sense that this statement = 4D? However, I'm not to certain if this ride is really 4D anyways. Please see my comment at the very bottom.--
Dom497 (
talk)
18:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
I have refocused that template because I'm skeptical that a couple of the other attractions should be considered 4D too. So now, we have 3D and 4D films at Universal Orlando
Going back to "making it the most expensive film per minute", what is the context? Is it the most expensive film in the history of movies, for example?
Just re-check the numerous red links, can any of them be turned blue by creating stubs? Can any of them be unlinked as they'd be unlikely to meet the notability requirements for Wikipedia in the short term?
Image licences seem fine to me, although the image of the pre-show room is a little odd, not particularly enlightening and of low quality, is it really helpful?
@
The Rambling Man: I'm leaving to go on a vacation on Sunday so I not be able to address any more comments. I have emailed the nominator to see if he can come to finish addressing the issues and determine if this ride is 3D or 4D.--
Dom497 (
talk)
18:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply