![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a template for Sys Requirements? It would be mighty nice if there is one-- sin-man 03:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
System requirements for software tend to increase over time,
One should rephrase that to indicate that it is the software that puts inclreasingly more reuiqrements upon the hardware. Rene.bach@isb.admin.ch
"Microsoft Internet Explorer is a frequent choice of software running on Microsoft Windows, which makes use of ActiveX controls, despite their vulnerabilities."
Should Internet vulnerabilities be mentioned in this article at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.150.113.26 ( talk) 23:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
I disagree with this statement: "...and a recommended set of requirements (for maximum performance)." In my experience recommended requirements are not the ones for maximum performance but the ones that make the program behave well (minimal wait times or latency, reasonable resolution, etc.). A system that exceeds the recommended requirements almost always runs a program more effectively than one that simply meets the recommended requirements, and thus "for maximum performance" is not the right parenthetical. -- DeweyQ 03:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi All! Considering the potential of this article it is important to expand it. I have started it and your welcome to contribute. It must not take long and you are requested to discuss changes here for a short while (while the Underconstruction template is on the page) to avoid edit-wars and conflicts. Please feel free to update/change/discuss the expansion once it is complete. You can leave a note on my talk page if you need me or think I have been fooling around longer than necessary. :) -- Vikas Kumar Ojha Talk to me! 00:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
It is much easier for me to edit existing stuff than think about what needs to go here! :-) We have to be careful not to let this become original research, so some claims will need citations. I have added one that I felt was particularly critical about Intel's popularity related to pure clock speed instead of throughput. Thank you Vikas for the great work so far! -- DeweyQ 13:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Good so far. I'd be wary of making it too complex but more detail needed in some sections. Also, can I suggest that "Intel Pentium CPUs have enjoyed a considerable degree of popularity, and are often mentioned in this category" is a subjective judgement. It has implications that are not substantiated perhaps it should be removed?-- Krayol ( talk) 10:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
It's great. ~ Flame vip e r Who's a Peach? 16:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
This article shows a very limited understanding of a SYSTEM. There are much more elaborate processes for space systems requirements establishment and maintenance worked out since mid of last century. Modern space elements as ISS Shuttle etc. have software embedded in their subsystem suit. The software system approach incl. system requirements contents, useage and verification is not yet mature compaired with space programs. Therefore each one suffered a major delay due to software problems.- The article needs major re-work to cover all other systems or has to be re-named to Software Systems Requirements. Hjpospie 16:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
The current article is not giving an general picture about Systems requirements in Engineering but focusses solely about computer systems requirements. So this article will be renamed to:
The reason for moving this article is, that we want to create a more general systems requirements article, with covers
And maybe even more specific fields - Mdd ( talk) 18:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Agree - Title not specific enough. Perhaps needs "Software and Hardware" in title? Googling "System Requirements" brings back almost entirely articles related to this, so should should not get confused with Req. Analysis. -- Krayol ( talk) 10:47, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a template for Sys Requirements? It would be mighty nice if there is one-- sin-man 03:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
System requirements for software tend to increase over time,
One should rephrase that to indicate that it is the software that puts inclreasingly more reuiqrements upon the hardware. Rene.bach@isb.admin.ch
"Microsoft Internet Explorer is a frequent choice of software running on Microsoft Windows, which makes use of ActiveX controls, despite their vulnerabilities."
Should Internet vulnerabilities be mentioned in this article at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.150.113.26 ( talk) 23:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
I disagree with this statement: "...and a recommended set of requirements (for maximum performance)." In my experience recommended requirements are not the ones for maximum performance but the ones that make the program behave well (minimal wait times or latency, reasonable resolution, etc.). A system that exceeds the recommended requirements almost always runs a program more effectively than one that simply meets the recommended requirements, and thus "for maximum performance" is not the right parenthetical. -- DeweyQ 03:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi All! Considering the potential of this article it is important to expand it. I have started it and your welcome to contribute. It must not take long and you are requested to discuss changes here for a short while (while the Underconstruction template is on the page) to avoid edit-wars and conflicts. Please feel free to update/change/discuss the expansion once it is complete. You can leave a note on my talk page if you need me or think I have been fooling around longer than necessary. :) -- Vikas Kumar Ojha Talk to me! 00:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
It is much easier for me to edit existing stuff than think about what needs to go here! :-) We have to be careful not to let this become original research, so some claims will need citations. I have added one that I felt was particularly critical about Intel's popularity related to pure clock speed instead of throughput. Thank you Vikas for the great work so far! -- DeweyQ 13:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Good so far. I'd be wary of making it too complex but more detail needed in some sections. Also, can I suggest that "Intel Pentium CPUs have enjoyed a considerable degree of popularity, and are often mentioned in this category" is a subjective judgement. It has implications that are not substantiated perhaps it should be removed?-- Krayol ( talk) 10:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
It's great. ~ Flame vip e r Who's a Peach? 16:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
This article shows a very limited understanding of a SYSTEM. There are much more elaborate processes for space systems requirements establishment and maintenance worked out since mid of last century. Modern space elements as ISS Shuttle etc. have software embedded in their subsystem suit. The software system approach incl. system requirements contents, useage and verification is not yet mature compaired with space programs. Therefore each one suffered a major delay due to software problems.- The article needs major re-work to cover all other systems or has to be re-named to Software Systems Requirements. Hjpospie 16:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
The current article is not giving an general picture about Systems requirements in Engineering but focusses solely about computer systems requirements. So this article will be renamed to:
The reason for moving this article is, that we want to create a more general systems requirements article, with covers
And maybe even more specific fields - Mdd ( talk) 18:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Agree - Title not specific enough. Perhaps needs "Software and Hardware" in title? Googling "System Requirements" brings back almost entirely articles related to this, so should should not get confused with Req. Analysis. -- Krayol ( talk) 10:47, 10 December 2008 (UTC)