This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Quotation from Wikipedia : WikiProject Spam – LinkReports – groups.yahoo.com:
Reporting statistics of link groups.yahoo.com; 59 records.
…
Link is not on the blacklist.
…
Below a full report on all use of the link groups.yahoo.com.
This list is intended to see how the external link gets used, it does not imply that involved accounts are having a conflict of interest in adding the link, or that the involved accounts are spamming the link.
Self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves
Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they be published experts in the field, so long as:
- the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;
- it does not involve claims about third parties;
- it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;
- there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity;
- the article is not based primarily on such sources.
"it's quite ironic that b.mollison would be so hung up about intellectual
property , but perhaps hi is just only projecting to the world what he himself, has done to his student: david holmgren, whose thesis known as "permaculture" , bill the mentor, accaparated [grabbed, accaparated is a french word for grabbed] it...transforming the original permaculture ethic that holmgren had in his thesis,(inspired by fukuoka), into a pyramidical classic cut throat type bussiness that by now is even hurting those people that had responded to the ecological solution that
holmgren intended permaculture to be. …"
— Emilia Hazelip, Email 23 Dec 2001.
Furthermore in reality on the historical facts side of this point that Emilia is right on also, see David Holmgren documenting, honestly, the same matters of facts side of this point himself—talking about himself in his chapter in the book: Dawborn, Kerry & Caroline Smith (eds) (2011) Permaculture Pioneers: Stories from the New Frontier Daylesford, VIC, Australia: Melliodora Publishing. One of many David Holmgren WP:SELFSOURCE’s for his WP article. ——-- macropneuma 07:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
WP has many errors of facts, still, for longer than even seven years. WP:BOLD does not mean the opposite of a long time present statement nor does it mean the opposite of a stability. Bold means bold, alone. Oppositional ideology, again; falsehoods—a house of cards only precariously staying standing in a mess while each card continues fighting all the others. How very silly. The bleeding obvious isn’t good enough, for guess what. It is not bold to correct a clear, unsourced error, no matter how long it has remained uncorrected in WP. ——An evident mindset fault. ——-- macropneuma 07:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC) ——-- macropneuma 13:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
"…i became interested
in permaculture mainly because fukuoka-san was mentioned, but permaculture for the annual plants either advices to consume less bread made out of wheat (& more out of chestnut, etc), or in spite of having raised beds & mulch for the vegetable garden, advises the use of compost & many other over the counter
bought products to keep going production…"
— Emilia Hazelip, Email 9 Nov 2002.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Synergistic gardening. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:54, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Quotation from Wikipedia : WikiProject Spam – LinkReports – groups.yahoo.com:
Reporting statistics of link groups.yahoo.com; 59 records.
…
Link is not on the blacklist.
…
Below a full report on all use of the link groups.yahoo.com.
This list is intended to see how the external link gets used, it does not imply that involved accounts are having a conflict of interest in adding the link, or that the involved accounts are spamming the link.
Self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves
Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they be published experts in the field, so long as:
- the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;
- it does not involve claims about third parties;
- it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;
- there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity;
- the article is not based primarily on such sources.
"it's quite ironic that b.mollison would be so hung up about intellectual
property , but perhaps hi is just only projecting to the world what he himself, has done to his student: david holmgren, whose thesis known as "permaculture" , bill the mentor, accaparated [grabbed, accaparated is a french word for grabbed] it...transforming the original permaculture ethic that holmgren had in his thesis,(inspired by fukuoka), into a pyramidical classic cut throat type bussiness that by now is even hurting those people that had responded to the ecological solution that
holmgren intended permaculture to be. …"
— Emilia Hazelip, Email 23 Dec 2001.
Furthermore in reality on the historical facts side of this point that Emilia is right on also, see David Holmgren documenting, honestly, the same matters of facts side of this point himself—talking about himself in his chapter in the book: Dawborn, Kerry & Caroline Smith (eds) (2011) Permaculture Pioneers: Stories from the New Frontier Daylesford, VIC, Australia: Melliodora Publishing. One of many David Holmgren WP:SELFSOURCE’s for his WP article. ——-- macropneuma 07:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
WP has many errors of facts, still, for longer than even seven years. WP:BOLD does not mean the opposite of a long time present statement nor does it mean the opposite of a stability. Bold means bold, alone. Oppositional ideology, again; falsehoods—a house of cards only precariously staying standing in a mess while each card continues fighting all the others. How very silly. The bleeding obvious isn’t good enough, for guess what. It is not bold to correct a clear, unsourced error, no matter how long it has remained uncorrected in WP. ——An evident mindset fault. ——-- macropneuma 07:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC) ——-- macropneuma 13:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
"…i became interested
in permaculture mainly because fukuoka-san was mentioned, but permaculture for the annual plants either advices to consume less bread made out of wheat (& more out of chestnut, etc), or in spite of having raised beds & mulch for the vegetable garden, advises the use of compost & many other over the counter
bought products to keep going production…"
— Emilia Hazelip, Email 9 Nov 2002.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Synergistic gardening. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:54, 5 April 2016 (UTC)