![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was reviewed by
Nature on December 14, 2005. Comments: It was found to have 2 errors. For more information about external reviews of Wikipedia articles and about this review in particular, see Nature|this page. |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Yasmin.Gaminchi.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 10:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
I removed a link to the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) costing billions of dollars from the economics section since the LHC is in fact not a synchrotron light source. -Mike Martin, ALS (Aug. 25, 2005)
Sychrotrons are not just the engines, that are synchrotron light sources. LHC is a synchrotron, and RHIC too.
The results of what exactly Nature suggested should be corrected is out... italicize each bullet point once you make the correction. -- user:zanimum
What type of medical imaging is Synchrotron light used for? Is this just another term to describe bremsstrahlung radiation?
Shouldn't particle therapy be mentioned under applications?
Perhans ( talk) 13:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)perhans
Caption for the first imagsddsde used to state "Synchrotrons are now mostly used for producing monochromatic high intensity X-ray beams". This has been removed since it is incorrect. Synchrotrons are actually capable of producing a continuous spectrum from the infrared to the X-ray region. Someone should make this clear in the article. Nowhere could I find it clearly stated that they produce light other than X-rays. The Australian Synchrotron Site has some extensive information that could be of use: http://www.synchrotron.org.au/content.asp?Document_ID=10
129.96.220.125 ( talk) 01:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
http://ssls.nus.edu.sg/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.2.5 ( talk) 00:14, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
The articled cited people with dates of birth and death next to their name. This is totally irrelevant (especially since the names hyperlink to biographical articles) and disrupts the flow of the article tremendously. Therefore I have removed these dates. Even if this is some kind of formal convention used in textbooks, it is not relevant in a hypertext format. Mrstonky ( talk) 11:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
I have removed the first image in the article, which contained a sketch of the Soleil synchrotron light source, since it was misleading in my opinion. Furthermore, i have pointed out the differences between a light source and a synchrotron. If you disagree, please join the discussion. BR84 ( talk) 22:49, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Since the table on this page consisted almost completely of synchrotron light sources, i have moved and merged its content with List of synchrotron radiation facilities. BR84 ( talk) 18:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Was it really unknown to him that Vladimir published the same idea a bit before? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.128.70.74 ( talk) 12:59, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
The article states: "The largest synchrotron-type accelerator is the 27 kilometre (17 mi) diameter Large Hadron Collider (LHC)...", while the article on the LHC states: "It lies in a tunnel 27 kilometres (17 mi) in circumference...". Which one is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.210.89.107 ( talk) 16:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
See Talk:Synchrocyclotron#Merge proposal. Please discuss there. Z22 ( talk) 05:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:06, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was reviewed by
Nature on December 14, 2005. Comments: It was found to have 2 errors. For more information about external reviews of Wikipedia articles and about this review in particular, see Nature|this page. |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Yasmin.Gaminchi.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 10:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
I removed a link to the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) costing billions of dollars from the economics section since the LHC is in fact not a synchrotron light source. -Mike Martin, ALS (Aug. 25, 2005)
Sychrotrons are not just the engines, that are synchrotron light sources. LHC is a synchrotron, and RHIC too.
The results of what exactly Nature suggested should be corrected is out... italicize each bullet point once you make the correction. -- user:zanimum
What type of medical imaging is Synchrotron light used for? Is this just another term to describe bremsstrahlung radiation?
Shouldn't particle therapy be mentioned under applications?
Perhans ( talk) 13:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)perhans
Caption for the first imagsddsde used to state "Synchrotrons are now mostly used for producing monochromatic high intensity X-ray beams". This has been removed since it is incorrect. Synchrotrons are actually capable of producing a continuous spectrum from the infrared to the X-ray region. Someone should make this clear in the article. Nowhere could I find it clearly stated that they produce light other than X-rays. The Australian Synchrotron Site has some extensive information that could be of use: http://www.synchrotron.org.au/content.asp?Document_ID=10
129.96.220.125 ( talk) 01:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
http://ssls.nus.edu.sg/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.2.5 ( talk) 00:14, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
The articled cited people with dates of birth and death next to their name. This is totally irrelevant (especially since the names hyperlink to biographical articles) and disrupts the flow of the article tremendously. Therefore I have removed these dates. Even if this is some kind of formal convention used in textbooks, it is not relevant in a hypertext format. Mrstonky ( talk) 11:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
I have removed the first image in the article, which contained a sketch of the Soleil synchrotron light source, since it was misleading in my opinion. Furthermore, i have pointed out the differences between a light source and a synchrotron. If you disagree, please join the discussion. BR84 ( talk) 22:49, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Since the table on this page consisted almost completely of synchrotron light sources, i have moved and merged its content with List of synchrotron radiation facilities. BR84 ( talk) 18:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Was it really unknown to him that Vladimir published the same idea a bit before? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.128.70.74 ( talk) 12:59, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
The article states: "The largest synchrotron-type accelerator is the 27 kilometre (17 mi) diameter Large Hadron Collider (LHC)...", while the article on the LHC states: "It lies in a tunnel 27 kilometres (17 mi) in circumference...". Which one is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.210.89.107 ( talk) 16:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
See Talk:Synchrocyclotron#Merge proposal. Please discuss there. Z22 ( talk) 05:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:06, 22 May 2019 (UTC)