This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I just realised that this is probably enough detail to not be called a stub? Shall I de-stubbify? -- BazDM 13:18, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
Hi, first time editor here. The reference for this sentence "Conversely, studies using transgenic mice in which neuronal signaling is abolished in specific circuitries showed that synaptic activity regulates, but is not essential to maintain, the expression of these proteins.[4]" says the exact opposite (Kiraha et al. PMID 18248909). It shows some the expression of other synaptic proteins is regulated by synaptic signalling, but that synapsin I is not. I don't know if there are other studies supporting this, but in the mean time I will delete this sentence. 131.111.109.40 ( talk) 15:44, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I just realised that this is probably enough detail to not be called a stub? Shall I de-stubbify? -- BazDM 13:18, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
Hi, first time editor here. The reference for this sentence "Conversely, studies using transgenic mice in which neuronal signaling is abolished in specific circuitries showed that synaptic activity regulates, but is not essential to maintain, the expression of these proteins.[4]" says the exact opposite (Kiraha et al. PMID 18248909). It shows some the expression of other synaptic proteins is regulated by synaptic signalling, but that synapsin I is not. I don't know if there are other studies supporting this, but in the mean time I will delete this sentence. 131.111.109.40 ( talk) 15:44, 15 November 2016 (UTC)