 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
BBC 2
I SAW THIS FILM ON BBC 2 AND IT HAD ITS ORIGINAL RADIO PICTURES LOGO. SO SINCE THIS FILM ALL PRE-1959 RKO FILMS HAVE BEEN RESTORED. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.139.118 ( talk) 14:50, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Neutrality questioned...
This article makes several comments about the quality of the movie. For example
while it is one of Astaire and Rogers' best movies, the film suffers from a weak plot and unimpressive performances from Metaxa and comic relief Moore
Is clearly not an impartial statement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.136.227 ( talk • contribs) 05:16, 7 July 2007
- Most Rogers & Astaire movie articles are POV. We need a massive cleanup- or at least NPOV templates. theBOBbobato ( talk) 18:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- The example above now includes citations for both its positive and negative aspects. Is that enough to remove the POV template? -- Pemilligan ( talk) 02:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think referenced critism should be enough to remove template. The examples of POV are not extreme, and its not something that's been contentious since theres only 3 comments since 2007. Clovis Sangrail ( talk) 06:05, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
BBC 2
I SAW THIS FILM ON BBC 2 AND IT HAD ITS ORIGINAL RADIO PICTURES LOGO. SO SINCE THIS FILM ALL PRE-1959 RKO FILMS HAVE BEEN RESTORED. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.139.118 ( talk) 14:50, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Neutrality questioned...
This article makes several comments about the quality of the movie. For example
while it is one of Astaire and Rogers' best movies, the film suffers from a weak plot and unimpressive performances from Metaxa and comic relief Moore
Is clearly not an impartial statement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.136.227 ( talk • contribs) 05:16, 7 July 2007
- Most Rogers & Astaire movie articles are POV. We need a massive cleanup- or at least NPOV templates. theBOBbobato ( talk) 18:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- The example above now includes citations for both its positive and negative aspects. Is that enough to remove the POV template? -- Pemilligan ( talk) 02:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think referenced critism should be enough to remove template. The examples of POV are not extreme, and its not something that's been contentious since theres only 3 comments since 2007. Clovis Sangrail ( talk) 06:05, 24 January 2010 (UTC)