![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Is the timeframe 1814-1905 and "Sweden in Union with Norway" really the best way to divide and focus the main article on Sweden's 19th century history? This sort of seems like a Norway-centric way of describing Sweden's history. Svwiki has instead the two articles sv:Sveriges historia 1809–1866 and sv:Sveriges historia 1866–1905, which provides a focus on the more dramatic loss of Finland in 1809, and Sweden's own constitutional and political changes. Actually, both language versions could use a lot more material on economical, industrial, scientific, educational and cultural changes and advances in this era, but that is another story. Tomas e ( talk) 18:12, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Roede ( talk) 21:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Is there really a need for a separate article under this title? I've read the comments above explaining it; but as it stands, there's a huge amount of overlap between this article and Union between Sweden and Norway. This article reads like a shorter, more Sweden-focused summary of that article. Even the titles are very similar. It could be more useful if it was rewritten to be specifically a history of Sweden in the 19th century; but as it is, given that it's mostly about the union, it seems largely redundant to that article, and I'm tempted to propose merging them back together. Robofish ( talk) 17:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Union between Sweden and Norway is a better, more detailed article (with sources) on the same topic. This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang ( talk) 20:19, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Proposed the page for deletion for reason above. This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang ( talk) 20:26, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Is the timeframe 1814-1905 and "Sweden in Union with Norway" really the best way to divide and focus the main article on Sweden's 19th century history? This sort of seems like a Norway-centric way of describing Sweden's history. Svwiki has instead the two articles sv:Sveriges historia 1809–1866 and sv:Sveriges historia 1866–1905, which provides a focus on the more dramatic loss of Finland in 1809, and Sweden's own constitutional and political changes. Actually, both language versions could use a lot more material on economical, industrial, scientific, educational and cultural changes and advances in this era, but that is another story. Tomas e ( talk) 18:12, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Roede ( talk) 21:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Is there really a need for a separate article under this title? I've read the comments above explaining it; but as it stands, there's a huge amount of overlap between this article and Union between Sweden and Norway. This article reads like a shorter, more Sweden-focused summary of that article. Even the titles are very similar. It could be more useful if it was rewritten to be specifically a history of Sweden in the 19th century; but as it is, given that it's mostly about the union, it seems largely redundant to that article, and I'm tempted to propose merging them back together. Robofish ( talk) 17:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Union between Sweden and Norway is a better, more detailed article (with sources) on the same topic. This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang ( talk) 20:19, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Proposed the page for deletion for reason above. This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang ( talk) 20:26, 20 May 2020 (UTC)