This article was nominated for deletion on 25 January 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Hinduism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

SJM is just two decades old. But the concept of Swadeshi is more than a century old to economic thinkers of India. The SJM should be given credit, if any, only for any achievements in the recent past that it has managed by taking up the Swadeshi policy. It cannot claim credit for everything that is Swadeshi. This is not ethical for Swadeshi is in fact the reckoning of Indian National Congress leaders during the British rule of India. SJM represents opposite group of Congress party now. Sailapathi ( talk) 19:50, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Sailapath reply

Hello Sailapathi

SJM only endorses Swadeshi concept , but does not claim to be the  founder of Swadeshi concept. Do make changes that you deem are neccessary amongst the paras