This article was nominated for deletion on 7 July 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Australia Low‑importance Sushmita Ruj is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Women scientists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Computer science This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{ WikiProject Computer science}}

Other than citations, there is nothing impressive about this researcher based on my research. If Wikipedia is to list everyone that has some citation, then every academic should have a page. This page looks more like self-promotion as much more senior and cited researchers do not have a Wiki page. There should be significant work by an academic to have a Wiki page. This page should be deleted, or the criteria for having a Wiki page should be clarified - in the history of this page, there is only a reference to this person's citation. 49.181.220.86 ( talk) 01:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC) reply

I will flag this page for review again. 88.239.138.93 ( talk) 15:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Agree with the previous post. What's the use of this page on Wikipedia? 49.195.113.30 ( talk) 02:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC) reply

While you're talking to yourself, perhaps you could explain which of the significant contributors to the article history you think is the "self" that is doing the self-promotion here. — David Eppstein ( talk) 07:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC) reply

it's not the article sources. You are clearly biased with the tone you are using in your reply. I ask again, do all academics at all universities have a Wiki page? have you seen the recent rankings based on publications? academics who deserve a Wiki page are those who have had an actual significant contribution to their field recognised for it. Either way, let's leave this conversation here public so users can judge. 49.186.30.211 ( talk) 01:12, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply

👍 103.237.137.48 ( talk) 08:21, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Yet another page on Wikipedia for some random academic. 91.223.100.53 ( talk) 12:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC) reply