Hi, I will be reviewing this article for GA. I feel that I cut my teeth on the first wrestling article of yours and will have much less trouble with this one. All in all, it looks very good.
- Sorry I wikilinked
kayfabe in your article. Even though I did a search, I did not find that you had already linked it above. It may not be harmful to have some of these obscure (to me) wrestling terms wikilinked more than once.
- Makes sense, instead of expecting the reader to go back to find the wikilink. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- I am wondering if
sharpshooter should be capitalized as in the body of the article it is capitalized, but in the chart below it is not.
- It is always capitalized on the WWE website, so I capitalized it in the chart. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should mention in the lead that this was thought to be the most boring wrestling event ever, as that seems distinctive.
- I added some information about the reception. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- I will add more comments after I read through it more. — Mattisse ( Talk) 23:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- "writing for 411mania.com" - shouldn't the name of a website be in italics?
- It might be helpful to shorten the size of some of the long paragraphs for readability. For example, the first paragraph under Background could be split in two.
- I split up some of the longer paragraphs in the background section. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing the article. I look forward to any further comments or suggestions, as you have been very helpful with both articles. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (
MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Hi, I will be reviewing this article for GA. I feel that I cut my teeth on the first wrestling article of yours and will have much less trouble with this one. All in all, it looks very good.
- Sorry I wikilinked
kayfabe in your article. Even though I did a search, I did not find that you had already linked it above. It may not be harmful to have some of these obscure (to me) wrestling terms wikilinked more than once.
- Makes sense, instead of expecting the reader to go back to find the wikilink. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- I am wondering if
sharpshooter should be capitalized as in the body of the article it is capitalized, but in the chart below it is not.
- It is always capitalized on the WWE website, so I capitalized it in the chart. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should mention in the lead that this was thought to be the most boring wrestling event ever, as that seems distinctive.
- I added some information about the reception. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- I will add more comments after I read through it more. — Mattisse ( Talk) 23:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- "writing for 411mania.com" - shouldn't the name of a website be in italics?
- It might be helpful to shorten the size of some of the long paragraphs for readability. For example, the first paragraph under Background could be split in two.
- I split up some of the longer paragraphs in the background section. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing the article. I look forward to any further comments or suggestions, as you have been very helpful with both articles. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (
MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: