![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Surety bond page were merged into Surety on 3 January 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 2 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Jcanaan (
article contribs).
I dropped:
[1] commercial site that sells surety bonds. This is a commercial site, also, it addresses surety bonds, rather than suretyship in general. Ellsworth 00:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Suretyship is a way of referring to the industry of surety bonds. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.53.231 ( talk) 16:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Previously the English form " Guarantee" was redirecting to Warranty which is not correct. I have redirected it here instead in the hope that it can help to move this article away from the heavy US bias. Dick G ( talk) 23:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
It is just the same thing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.12.214 ( talk) 00:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Guarantee#Notability/separate article. --
Trevj (
talk) 12:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC) --
Trevj (
talk)
12:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi BD2412 ( talk · contribs), were you planning on opening a talk page discussion elaborating on your reasoning for reverting the merge and restoring all the content which duplicates surety bond and inaccurately suggests that surety is synonymous with surety bond? The problem of the disambig template can be fixed by simply removing that template. There was a merge suggestion here since 2012, a merge template on top of surety bond since March 2013, and you didn't explain why we shouldn't merge the two, which all points to consensus. We can iterate on the specifics of how this article looks but the first step is removing all the junk. The concept is guarantee, although that article is overly wordy, and the two children are surety bond and loan guarantee; my revision corrected the inaccuracy by pointing to and describing all three. II | ( t - c) 15:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
I propose that Surety bond be merged into Surety. I think that the content in the Surety bond article can easily be explained in the context of Surety, and the Surety article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Surety bond will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Most of interwiki did the same. Shmurak ( talk) 13:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Surety bond page were merged into Surety on 3 January 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 2 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Jcanaan (
article contribs).
I dropped:
[1] commercial site that sells surety bonds. This is a commercial site, also, it addresses surety bonds, rather than suretyship in general. Ellsworth 00:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Suretyship is a way of referring to the industry of surety bonds. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.53.231 ( talk) 16:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Previously the English form " Guarantee" was redirecting to Warranty which is not correct. I have redirected it here instead in the hope that it can help to move this article away from the heavy US bias. Dick G ( talk) 23:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
It is just the same thing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.12.214 ( talk) 00:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Guarantee#Notability/separate article. --
Trevj (
talk) 12:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC) --
Trevj (
talk)
12:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi BD2412 ( talk · contribs), were you planning on opening a talk page discussion elaborating on your reasoning for reverting the merge and restoring all the content which duplicates surety bond and inaccurately suggests that surety is synonymous with surety bond? The problem of the disambig template can be fixed by simply removing that template. There was a merge suggestion here since 2012, a merge template on top of surety bond since March 2013, and you didn't explain why we shouldn't merge the two, which all points to consensus. We can iterate on the specifics of how this article looks but the first step is removing all the junk. The concept is guarantee, although that article is overly wordy, and the two children are surety bond and loan guarantee; my revision corrected the inaccuracy by pointing to and describing all three. II | ( t - c) 15:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
I propose that Surety bond be merged into Surety. I think that the content in the Surety bond article can easily be explained in the context of Surety, and the Surety article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Surety bond will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Most of interwiki did the same. Shmurak ( talk) 13:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)