![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Suppressive Person, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Suppressive Person, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article at the Reference desk. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Suppressive person article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | On 16 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Suppressive Person to Suppressive person. The result of the discussion was moved. |
See Talk:Suppressive_Person/Archive_2#Capitalization. We should fix this. Dicklyon ( talk) 03:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Favonian ( talk) 16:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Suppressive Person → Suppressive person – Just because scientology caps this doesn't make it a proper name. Book usage patterns clearly show it's not consistently capped in sources, which would be especially true in "independent" sources as MOS:CAPS says to look to. Dicklyon ( talk) 16:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia relies on sources to determine what is conventionally capitalized. Grorp ( talk) 02:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC) (Edited to move the period. Grorp ( talk) 05:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC))
only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia"), and here there's not much reason to see capitalization as necessary. Dicklyon ( talk) 03:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Suppressive Person, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Suppressive Person, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article at the Reference desk. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Suppressive person article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | On 16 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Suppressive Person to Suppressive person. The result of the discussion was moved. |
See Talk:Suppressive_Person/Archive_2#Capitalization. We should fix this. Dicklyon ( talk) 03:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Favonian ( talk) 16:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Suppressive Person → Suppressive person – Just because scientology caps this doesn't make it a proper name. Book usage patterns clearly show it's not consistently capped in sources, which would be especially true in "independent" sources as MOS:CAPS says to look to. Dicklyon ( talk) 16:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia relies on sources to determine what is conventionally capitalized. Grorp ( talk) 02:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC) (Edited to move the period. Grorp ( talk) 05:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC))
only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia"), and here there's not much reason to see capitalization as necessary. Dicklyon ( talk) 03:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)