This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chemistry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Physics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Them From Space

• Resolved I don't think it's copyrightable atm Sennecaster ( Chat) 03:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

I added the copyright warning tag to this article because its author's other two recently created articles were copy/paste copyright violations of the IUPAC Gold Book. This article is very similiar in scope and context to the two that were deleted, yet I was unable to find a source where this could have come from. Any chemist who can bother to rewrite this article without infringing on copyright should go ahead and do so. Them From Space 00:21, 18 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Superlattice Doesn't it worth to make a common article for this kind of structures? There is also a relationship with articles where multilayer optical devices are mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.146.9.175 ( talk) 11:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I think the two articles Superstructure & Overlayer should be merged into one. Thoughts? -- Blue.painting ( talk) 14:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC) reply