This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. United States: Military history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force. Cold War Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: January 10 to 16, 2016 (22nd)

Deleted phrase 'height of the Cold War' as this is a meaningless term which can be applied to many points between 1947-1989 - 25 June 2009. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.123.225.69 ( talk • contribs) 01:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Early in the article it states that the common belief that the vehicle itself would release so much radiation during normal flight operations that it could be considered a "secondary" weapons in and of itself was a "misconception" while later the article states the program was cancelled because, amongst other things, it was thought testing would be problematic because of the amount of radiation that would be released - which is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.91.48.16 ( talk) 13:25, 15 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Not— please, try an actual moment of reflexion upon the subject and the context, a flight to target would be a one-time and unique path with perishing small transitory exposure to any one point upon the ground below, it’s not a loitering drone, whereas, a test facility of even a low number of limited test cycles would leave that land-based location a tad bit, uh, saturated. WurmWoode ^T 04:06, 14 August 2019 (UTC) reply

But both of the external links at the bottom of this article directly contradict the claims that the radiation from the vehicle itself wouldn't be dangerous. 173.226.63.104 ( talk) 18:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC) reply