GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Adamstom.97 ( talk · contribs) 04:54, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
I'm taking this one! This is clearly an important article, and one that has gone through a bit of history in terms of quality assessment apparently. I'll have a good read through this and the related talk pages and get on to the review as soon as I can. -
adamstom97 (
talk)
04:54, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
I agree that In other media is still a work in progress. I am trying to obtain audience and revenue statistics for these shows. Kurzon ( talk) 08:57, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
As for Critical reception and popularity, I think we should delete it all. The awards mention in the bullet list are not all that insightful for describing the full scope of Superman's prestige and popularity. Something more useful would be sales statistics and revenues. For that, I plan to add such statistics in Publishing history and In other media because it's next to impossible to get a simple and accurate overview of the whole franchise. Kurzon ( talk) 09:06, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in getting to this. Unfortunately, I do not believe that this article is up to the standard of GA and it looks like the improvements suggested during the FARs have not been implemented. There is still a lot of unsourced content in the article which needs to be sorted out. I am also concerned with the critical response section as it is one of the most important sections for most articles and needs to be much better than it currently is. Additionally, the article just does not appear to be stable. I suggest all the editors who are currently working on the article and discussing issues at the talk page ensure that these problems I have raised here be dealt with, and that they are all happy with the state of the article, before re-nominating it for GA. This is an important article, and it makes me sad that I cannot promote it to GA, but I am going to have to fail this review. Good luck with improving the article and getting it promoted in the future! - adamstom97 ( talk) 07:12, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
I have deleted Critical reception and popularity because of the criticisms here. Kurzon ( talk) 07:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Adamstom.97 ( talk · contribs) 04:54, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
I'm taking this one! This is clearly an important article, and one that has gone through a bit of history in terms of quality assessment apparently. I'll have a good read through this and the related talk pages and get on to the review as soon as I can. -
adamstom97 (
talk)
04:54, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
I agree that In other media is still a work in progress. I am trying to obtain audience and revenue statistics for these shows. Kurzon ( talk) 08:57, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
As for Critical reception and popularity, I think we should delete it all. The awards mention in the bullet list are not all that insightful for describing the full scope of Superman's prestige and popularity. Something more useful would be sales statistics and revenues. For that, I plan to add such statistics in Publishing history and In other media because it's next to impossible to get a simple and accurate overview of the whole franchise. Kurzon ( talk) 09:06, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in getting to this. Unfortunately, I do not believe that this article is up to the standard of GA and it looks like the improvements suggested during the FARs have not been implemented. There is still a lot of unsourced content in the article which needs to be sorted out. I am also concerned with the critical response section as it is one of the most important sections for most articles and needs to be much better than it currently is. Additionally, the article just does not appear to be stable. I suggest all the editors who are currently working on the article and discussing issues at the talk page ensure that these problems I have raised here be dealt with, and that they are all happy with the state of the article, before re-nominating it for GA. This is an important article, and it makes me sad that I cannot promote it to GA, but I am going to have to fail this review. Good luck with improving the article and getting it promoted in the future! - adamstom97 ( talk) 07:12, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
I have deleted Critical reception and popularity because of the criticisms here. Kurzon ( talk) 07:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)