This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
The inscription of the stone marks it was made in Qing dynasty. Is the inscription really the one made in Song dynasty? — HenryLi ( Talk) 11:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
This article says that "Zhao Bing committed suicide", but the Song Dynasty article says that an imperial courtier jumped over a cliff with him in his arms. This would suggest that the boy king had little choice in the matter. Which is correct? Rodparkes 06:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Matthew hk argued in this and this edit that the park will be relocated. The source he quoted got nothing about relocation. It only says part of the new development area will be designated part of the park. It is not known from the source he quoted whether the existing park will be preserved or designated for other use(s). I'd suggest taking out that whole paragraph altogether until we figured out what exactly would happen. 1.64.46.31 ( talk) 16:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
The inscription of the stone marks it was made in Qing dynasty. Is the inscription really the one made in Song dynasty? — HenryLi ( Talk) 11:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
This article says that "Zhao Bing committed suicide", but the Song Dynasty article says that an imperial courtier jumped over a cliff with him in his arms. This would suggest that the boy king had little choice in the matter. Which is correct? Rodparkes 06:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Matthew hk argued in this and this edit that the park will be relocated. The source he quoted got nothing about relocation. It only says part of the new development area will be designated part of the park. It is not known from the source he quoted whether the existing park will be preserved or designated for other use(s). I'd suggest taking out that whole paragraph altogether until we figured out what exactly would happen. 1.64.46.31 ( talk) 16:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)