This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles Poetry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Holzman lists extensive examples of what he describes are the positives and the shortcomings in the translation of this book. It's good to get the book reviews to see what others think about the book.

Raffel also lists his criticisms. WhisperToMe ( talk) 09:41, 21 December 2013 (UTC) reply

This book uses the 19th Century James Legge Chinese-English version of the Classic of Poetry as its source (from Upton p. 524). Beth Upton states on p. 524 that she "questions the advisability of using" this version because "the Shih ching is a Classic and several more authoritative editions exist in any respectable Chinese library." WhisperToMe ( talk) 08:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Upton's Chinese name, on p. 524, seems to be 秦婦吟 Qín Fùyín ( This is a title of a Chinese poem)

• In fact it isn't her name, but it is being used as a reference to a name of a poem (indicated by the "a") WhisperToMe ( talk) 00:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC) reply

From p. 523: "a brief introduction explaining how historical, philosophical, cultural and linguistic events shaped this period and influenced later eras would add greatly to the enjoyment and understanding of intelligent but ignorant readers and send them more willingly to the Bibliographies. Such extra information, however, would probably necessitate dividing the already bulky paperback into two volumes." WhisperToMe ( talk) 09:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC) reply