TALK:SULTAN ABDUL HALIM MUADZAM SHAH BRIDGE

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sultan Abdul Halim Muadzam Shah Bridge article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highways: Asia Mid‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Asian Highways Task Force.

No info on why the bridge is not a straight line crossing

Can anyone shed a light on this? I'm sure other readers are curious to know too 175.139.240.66 ( talk) 05:42, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Ok, someone fixed it already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.1.70.153 ( talk) 10:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC) reply