This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sucharit Bhakdi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article. If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review the relevant Wikipedia policy on recruitment of editors, as well as the neutral point of view policy. Disputes on Wikipedia are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Quite some of the statements in this Wikipedia article are worded in a way that is very biased towards an unpopular opinion that is partly plain wrong and partly fairly dubious, which is just strengthened by the fact that this article is worded like it's an article made by Bild, and on top of that locked for corrections.
He was not a source of misinformation, but rather an independent source of research just as other independent researchers and sources such as Dr. Botha.
Also his antisemitic statements were not antisemitic whatsoever and is just plain wrong. 46.128.215.37 ( talk) 14:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
an independent source of researchWhat research is that? In which peer-reviewed scientific journal did he publish it? If he did not, it is not research but opinion. -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 14:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
He was found not guilty, maybe you can clean up the smearing… 2A02:A03F:6946:2A00:4D24:1431:38A3:EF98 ( talk) 00:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
The description is extremely biased misinformation that takes away credibility of the site. Real science welcomes debate and discussion. 96.48.125.176 ( talk) 07:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
The article is extremely biased and most of the "fact check" citations are opinion or three years old. Much newer information regarding Dr Bhakdi's coment have come about. One is the "vaccines" are indeed killing people. The Us National Academy of Science has stated that any myocarditis after "vaccination" is caused by the "vaccine". That's essentially killing people. It is biased articles like this that caused me to stop being a donor for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruce A. WIlliamson ( talk • contribs) 14:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sucharit Bhakdi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article. If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review the relevant Wikipedia policy on recruitment of editors, as well as the neutral point of view policy. Disputes on Wikipedia are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Quite some of the statements in this Wikipedia article are worded in a way that is very biased towards an unpopular opinion that is partly plain wrong and partly fairly dubious, which is just strengthened by the fact that this article is worded like it's an article made by Bild, and on top of that locked for corrections.
He was not a source of misinformation, but rather an independent source of research just as other independent researchers and sources such as Dr. Botha.
Also his antisemitic statements were not antisemitic whatsoever and is just plain wrong. 46.128.215.37 ( talk) 14:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
an independent source of researchWhat research is that? In which peer-reviewed scientific journal did he publish it? If he did not, it is not research but opinion. -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 14:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
He was found not guilty, maybe you can clean up the smearing… 2A02:A03F:6946:2A00:4D24:1431:38A3:EF98 ( talk) 00:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
The description is extremely biased misinformation that takes away credibility of the site. Real science welcomes debate and discussion. 96.48.125.176 ( talk) 07:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
The article is extremely biased and most of the "fact check" citations are opinion or three years old. Much newer information regarding Dr Bhakdi's coment have come about. One is the "vaccines" are indeed killing people. The Us National Academy of Science has stated that any myocarditis after "vaccination" is caused by the "vaccine". That's essentially killing people. It is biased articles like this that caused me to stop being a donor for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruce A. WIlliamson ( talk • contribs) 14:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)