![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Here is the actual quote about Nitao and Parodi's architecture from that paper. Anyone who reads any paper actually on Subsumption Architecture will see how far off this is immediately.
This sounds like a cross between GOFAI and blackboard architectures. Arguably, SA is like the latter. But all the main points of the SA are missed except for those shared with any modular system. Also, the publications came out the same year so presumably the systems were both in development at the same time. There is no evidence this work was known in 1984.-- Jaibe 22:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Someone deleted the modules link & called it disambiguating. I looked at the ambiguous modules page, and at least half of the links there are relevant to the use of modularity in AI, so I think it makes sense to link to the whole page. Unless someone wants to start a special page on modules in AI, but I don't know what that would have beyond modularity in programming, maths and mind.-- Jaibe 22:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
what does this mean: "Feedback is given mainly through the environment."? Few internal sensors? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.89.243.196 ( talk) 18:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
when i read this i have to constantly swap "lower" with "higher" in my head. the condition that get checked first is on top. Thus, the "more abstract", longer-term goal orientated production rules are on the bottom. if a then b else if c then d else... etc. it's upside-down. Kevin Baas talk 14:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
This article was the subject of an educational assignment at College Of Engineering Pune supported by
Wikipedia Ambassadors through the
India Education Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available
on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
20:04, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Here is the actual quote about Nitao and Parodi's architecture from that paper. Anyone who reads any paper actually on Subsumption Architecture will see how far off this is immediately.
This sounds like a cross between GOFAI and blackboard architectures. Arguably, SA is like the latter. But all the main points of the SA are missed except for those shared with any modular system. Also, the publications came out the same year so presumably the systems were both in development at the same time. There is no evidence this work was known in 1984.-- Jaibe 22:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Someone deleted the modules link & called it disambiguating. I looked at the ambiguous modules page, and at least half of the links there are relevant to the use of modularity in AI, so I think it makes sense to link to the whole page. Unless someone wants to start a special page on modules in AI, but I don't know what that would have beyond modularity in programming, maths and mind.-- Jaibe 22:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
what does this mean: "Feedback is given mainly through the environment."? Few internal sensors? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.89.243.196 ( talk) 18:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
when i read this i have to constantly swap "lower" with "higher" in my head. the condition that get checked first is on top. Thus, the "more abstract", longer-term goal orientated production rules are on the bottom. if a then b else if c then d else... etc. it's upside-down. Kevin Baas talk 14:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
This article was the subject of an educational assignment at College Of Engineering Pune supported by
Wikipedia Ambassadors through the
India Education Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available
on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
20:04, 1 February 2023 (UTC)