![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall Semester 2016. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Hong Kong/Regional Geology (Fall Semester 2016)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
![]() | A fact from Subduction polarity reversal appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 January 2017 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Hi Vincent! This is Jeffrey your regional geology classmate. I really like the topic of your page and have a few suggestions for improvement of the page:
1. I suggest labeling the plate names in english and point out the occurrence of subduction reversal in the world map (it is not indicated although it was mentioned in the caption)
2. In the lithospheric break-up model, i think more explanation on how the rotation of the frontal block of overriding plate results in a new subduction direction is needed. It would make understanding the model much easier.
3. The last diagram of is a bit messed up as the words are misplaced and overlap with each other. It is probably not your problem but a problem resulting from the export of the original file. It seems to be ok in preview(but the words are too small), but messed up when click into the file to get a full view.
4. It would better for readers if the legends are shown in all the stages(diagrams) of the gifs you made, i.e. not just shown in the first stage(diagram) as one diagram only lasts for 1-2 seconds, which make us hard to read.
Cheers!
Jeffrey
Hi Vincent, I think your page is really interesting with great diagrams and good approach to explaining the models that make it easy to understand. There are a few things that I think you should adjust:
1) The start could be better if you say your topic and clear outline in the opening sentence, maybe you could combine the first few sentences. I read here... /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles ...that the first sentence should say what it is and give a good overview.
2) The section on Geological Distribution needs a look over the sentences. Also in other places the sentence structure could be a bit clearer.
3) For some of the models of Taiwan could you make the key and arrow last longer so people can see what is what more easily.
4) Some areas could be expanded a bit more to make it clearer. Like the model section you could say why Taiwan gives such a good overview of all the stages, in the progressive tearing section relate the Laurentian Margin example to the closure of the Iapetus ocean to help people place it in geological time and for the models section am I right in thinking that you give 3 ways in which the subduction polarity flipping occurs - maybe these could have a clearer introduction.
I liked reading it!
Beth — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.153.126.124 ( talk) 05:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello Vincent! Skylar from your class =] I have not read much about this topic and it is attracting reading your page, especially the diagrams. Here are some comments for you.
1. Very nice diagrams and animations show clearly the cross-sections and the mechanism of models. The models become easy to understand with help of animations. The map also helps understanding the positions of each cross section very well. For animations, the legends and the labelling should appear in each slide but not only the first slide, so that readers can keep track of what is each part throughout the animation. The descripting paragraphs can be improved by adding notes stating each sentence or sentences are referring to which slide. The animations and cross-sections may need amendments on the font sizes and image sizes, since they are quite hard to read without enlarging the images. And it seems the cross-section image cannot be enlarged.
2. For the models, the parts show clearly the geometry and mechanism of the systems, but there is few explanation of the kinematics of the systems. I think explanation can be added to explain why a certain model happens in a certain place, like providing some brief descriptions on the regional tectonic, the evidence to support such models and what have happened after the flipping.
3. The flow of contents is generally easy to follow. I think the first part of the page should be moved to the Taiwan’s example part. The first of a page should be something that provide a glimpse of what subduction polarity flipping is about, like in the introduction part, rather than a paragraph for saying why the flipping is interesting. Moreover, more detailed description might be provided for explaining the geometry of the flipping, like using simple diagrams, since readers need to know what exactly is flipping before knowing the models.
Add oil =]
Skylar - SkylYip ( talk) 14:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi Vincent! Here are some suggestions for minor changes:
Jjyyu8 ( talk) 11:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey Vincent, I like your use in animated diagrams in your page and I think your topic is very intriguing. Here are some suggestions for your page:
Keep up with the good work :D. Cloudnstars ( talk) 12:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Vincent, I have read the page. I am able to understand the basic idea of Subduction Polarity Change, which is a good thing. Yet a few things can be polished so that the page would be better.
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall Semester 2016. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Hong Kong/Regional Geology (Fall Semester 2016)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
![]() | A fact from Subduction polarity reversal appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 January 2017 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Hi Vincent! This is Jeffrey your regional geology classmate. I really like the topic of your page and have a few suggestions for improvement of the page:
1. I suggest labeling the plate names in english and point out the occurrence of subduction reversal in the world map (it is not indicated although it was mentioned in the caption)
2. In the lithospheric break-up model, i think more explanation on how the rotation of the frontal block of overriding plate results in a new subduction direction is needed. It would make understanding the model much easier.
3. The last diagram of is a bit messed up as the words are misplaced and overlap with each other. It is probably not your problem but a problem resulting from the export of the original file. It seems to be ok in preview(but the words are too small), but messed up when click into the file to get a full view.
4. It would better for readers if the legends are shown in all the stages(diagrams) of the gifs you made, i.e. not just shown in the first stage(diagram) as one diagram only lasts for 1-2 seconds, which make us hard to read.
Cheers!
Jeffrey
Hi Vincent, I think your page is really interesting with great diagrams and good approach to explaining the models that make it easy to understand. There are a few things that I think you should adjust:
1) The start could be better if you say your topic and clear outline in the opening sentence, maybe you could combine the first few sentences. I read here... /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles ...that the first sentence should say what it is and give a good overview.
2) The section on Geological Distribution needs a look over the sentences. Also in other places the sentence structure could be a bit clearer.
3) For some of the models of Taiwan could you make the key and arrow last longer so people can see what is what more easily.
4) Some areas could be expanded a bit more to make it clearer. Like the model section you could say why Taiwan gives such a good overview of all the stages, in the progressive tearing section relate the Laurentian Margin example to the closure of the Iapetus ocean to help people place it in geological time and for the models section am I right in thinking that you give 3 ways in which the subduction polarity flipping occurs - maybe these could have a clearer introduction.
I liked reading it!
Beth — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.153.126.124 ( talk) 05:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello Vincent! Skylar from your class =] I have not read much about this topic and it is attracting reading your page, especially the diagrams. Here are some comments for you.
1. Very nice diagrams and animations show clearly the cross-sections and the mechanism of models. The models become easy to understand with help of animations. The map also helps understanding the positions of each cross section very well. For animations, the legends and the labelling should appear in each slide but not only the first slide, so that readers can keep track of what is each part throughout the animation. The descripting paragraphs can be improved by adding notes stating each sentence or sentences are referring to which slide. The animations and cross-sections may need amendments on the font sizes and image sizes, since they are quite hard to read without enlarging the images. And it seems the cross-section image cannot be enlarged.
2. For the models, the parts show clearly the geometry and mechanism of the systems, but there is few explanation of the kinematics of the systems. I think explanation can be added to explain why a certain model happens in a certain place, like providing some brief descriptions on the regional tectonic, the evidence to support such models and what have happened after the flipping.
3. The flow of contents is generally easy to follow. I think the first part of the page should be moved to the Taiwan’s example part. The first of a page should be something that provide a glimpse of what subduction polarity flipping is about, like in the introduction part, rather than a paragraph for saying why the flipping is interesting. Moreover, more detailed description might be provided for explaining the geometry of the flipping, like using simple diagrams, since readers need to know what exactly is flipping before knowing the models.
Add oil =]
Skylar - SkylYip ( talk) 14:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi Vincent! Here are some suggestions for minor changes:
Jjyyu8 ( talk) 11:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey Vincent, I like your use in animated diagrams in your page and I think your topic is very intriguing. Here are some suggestions for your page:
Keep up with the good work :D. Cloudnstars ( talk) 12:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Vincent, I have read the page. I am able to understand the basic idea of Subduction Polarity Change, which is a good thing. Yet a few things can be polished so that the page would be better.