This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Pachycephalosaurus Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Pachycephalosaurus |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Let's remember to watch the weasel words and speculation in this and other articles. Imputing behavior, or functions for anatomy, on the basis of "it seems obvious" is questionable science. :-) -- Writtenonsand 22:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Could someone P*L*E*A*S*E take the time to read the comments and referred articles on the Dracorex-Stigymoloch-Pachycephalosaurus situation featured here: http://paleoking.blogspot.com/2010/01/farewell-to-2009-yeares-best-and-worst.html
The article's tone seems to take Horner's proposal of Stygimoloch being a juvenile of another pachy species for granted way too much; the matter is still very much open to debate, and that is not reflected here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.230.91.121 ( talk) 13:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
"Stygimoloch" doesn't mean "thorny devil from the River Styx" it means "devil from the River Styx" (not that Moloch is necessarily a devil; depends on the tradition). You need the "spinifer" to get "thorny." 72.240.64.25 ( talk) 14:21, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Since nobody has countered these arguments on the Pachycephalosaurus talk page, I am bringing them up here, copied and pasted in their entirety. 85.211.136.200 ( talk) 10:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Don’t you think you’re jumping the gun a bit by lumping ‘’Stygimoloch’’ under ‘’Pachycephalosaurus’’? I mean, they don’t even belong to the same strata. ‘’Stygimoloch’’ is more recent than ‘’Pachycephalosaurus’’ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.75.110.242 ( talk) 05:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Pachycephalosaurus Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Pachycephalosaurus |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Let's remember to watch the weasel words and speculation in this and other articles. Imputing behavior, or functions for anatomy, on the basis of "it seems obvious" is questionable science. :-) -- Writtenonsand 22:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Could someone P*L*E*A*S*E take the time to read the comments and referred articles on the Dracorex-Stigymoloch-Pachycephalosaurus situation featured here: http://paleoking.blogspot.com/2010/01/farewell-to-2009-yeares-best-and-worst.html
The article's tone seems to take Horner's proposal of Stygimoloch being a juvenile of another pachy species for granted way too much; the matter is still very much open to debate, and that is not reflected here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.230.91.121 ( talk) 13:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
"Stygimoloch" doesn't mean "thorny devil from the River Styx" it means "devil from the River Styx" (not that Moloch is necessarily a devil; depends on the tradition). You need the "spinifer" to get "thorny." 72.240.64.25 ( talk) 14:21, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Since nobody has countered these arguments on the Pachycephalosaurus talk page, I am bringing them up here, copied and pasted in their entirety. 85.211.136.200 ( talk) 10:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Don’t you think you’re jumping the gun a bit by lumping ‘’Stygimoloch’’ under ‘’Pachycephalosaurus’’? I mean, they don’t even belong to the same strata. ‘’Stygimoloch’’ is more recent than ‘’Pachycephalosaurus’’ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.75.110.242 ( talk) 05:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)