![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
I do not believe this movement is notable having done a google search. There appears to be no reference in mainstream media.
Wikipedia policy at Wikipedia:Reliable sources is the policy on the use of sources. The policy queries the use of sources which "have an agenda or conflict of interest, strong views, or other bias which may color their report" and suggests such sources "may be used as primary sources only i.e. as sources about themselves, and even then with caution and sparingly." I do not think the possible sources in external links, or any I have turned up in google searching meet the criteria.-- A Y Arktos 06:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
The info in the article seems valuable - remember that Wiki is a resource, and if anyone wants toi find out about Stuckism in Australia, this piece can tell them useful things. Whether it be merged back into ageneral article on Stuckism I have no opinion, but certainly Stuckism per se is important enough to warrant an entry. PiCo 10:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
"Stuckism in Australia" This is my first article on this site and I was surprised and disappointed to be told that it is not notable enough and that Stuckism in Australia as a movement does not exist. I did not say there was a cohesive whole movement but that there existed several small groups. In the article it states that "manifestations of Stuckism" appeared in Australia spreading from the original movement in The UK. It has been implied that there have been no press releases referring to the Stuckists in Australia. There have been in fact several articles in the press and much of this has now been placed on the site. One article mentions the Stuckists in Australia - "State of the Arts", magazine for the arts, called "Stuck for a new ISM". In Western Australia, Ron Banks, Arts Editor of the West Australian newspaper wrote an article on Stuckism and my involvement called "Getting stuck into Concepts" and more recently the West published another piece about Stuckism and my current solo show which is running at Stafford Studios here in Perth. When I did a search for Stuckism in Australia through Google and Yahoo I found over 500 web sites which detailed their existance! Hope this demonstrates that Stuckism in Australia is a viable and worthy entity.
Regards,
Godfrey Blow (Perth Stuckists).
Its pretty obvious that this is Spam. The page is self-promotion by a couple of people who are trying to claim that they are internationally important. Its a Blog by other means. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.1.237.40 ( talk • contribs).
I can only agree with many of the above comments. This page in its current form is an out and out Blog (I see that it was mostly written by the person it is about). This sort of entry undermines what the Wiki is about, and fuels arguments by our critics that the encyclopedia is flawed with misinformation. After all, it also contains some spurious historical claims that ought to be removed. Having written a book on the Antipodeans Group - and personally knowing several of them - that particular section had me in stitches. They were a precedent? Nonsense. The art represented by Stuckism is actually what they were taking a stand against. Heaven help the Wiki if much more of this fabricated historical information gets in. Dr Christopher Heathcote 23:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Stuckism in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Stuckism in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
I do not believe this movement is notable having done a google search. There appears to be no reference in mainstream media.
Wikipedia policy at Wikipedia:Reliable sources is the policy on the use of sources. The policy queries the use of sources which "have an agenda or conflict of interest, strong views, or other bias which may color their report" and suggests such sources "may be used as primary sources only i.e. as sources about themselves, and even then with caution and sparingly." I do not think the possible sources in external links, or any I have turned up in google searching meet the criteria.-- A Y Arktos 06:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
The info in the article seems valuable - remember that Wiki is a resource, and if anyone wants toi find out about Stuckism in Australia, this piece can tell them useful things. Whether it be merged back into ageneral article on Stuckism I have no opinion, but certainly Stuckism per se is important enough to warrant an entry. PiCo 10:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
"Stuckism in Australia" This is my first article on this site and I was surprised and disappointed to be told that it is not notable enough and that Stuckism in Australia as a movement does not exist. I did not say there was a cohesive whole movement but that there existed several small groups. In the article it states that "manifestations of Stuckism" appeared in Australia spreading from the original movement in The UK. It has been implied that there have been no press releases referring to the Stuckists in Australia. There have been in fact several articles in the press and much of this has now been placed on the site. One article mentions the Stuckists in Australia - "State of the Arts", magazine for the arts, called "Stuck for a new ISM". In Western Australia, Ron Banks, Arts Editor of the West Australian newspaper wrote an article on Stuckism and my involvement called "Getting stuck into Concepts" and more recently the West published another piece about Stuckism and my current solo show which is running at Stafford Studios here in Perth. When I did a search for Stuckism in Australia through Google and Yahoo I found over 500 web sites which detailed their existance! Hope this demonstrates that Stuckism in Australia is a viable and worthy entity.
Regards,
Godfrey Blow (Perth Stuckists).
Its pretty obvious that this is Spam. The page is self-promotion by a couple of people who are trying to claim that they are internationally important. Its a Blog by other means. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.1.237.40 ( talk • contribs).
I can only agree with many of the above comments. This page in its current form is an out and out Blog (I see that it was mostly written by the person it is about). This sort of entry undermines what the Wiki is about, and fuels arguments by our critics that the encyclopedia is flawed with misinformation. After all, it also contains some spurious historical claims that ought to be removed. Having written a book on the Antipodeans Group - and personally knowing several of them - that particular section had me in stitches. They were a precedent? Nonsense. The art represented by Stuckism is actually what they were taking a stand against. Heaven help the Wiki if much more of this fabricated historical information gets in. Dr Christopher Heathcote 23:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Stuckism in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Stuckism in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)