![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is it really proper to move this to Struma? Is there a regular English term for it? In my experience it is always Strymon, but that's mostly from reading references to it in the context of ancient Greece. (Google gets 594 results for "Strymon River" and 641 for "Struma River", by the way.) Adam Bishop 13:37, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
How can it go 400 km south if it's only 290 km long? The other way around would make sense. However, another possibility is that one or both numbers are incorrect. Jeroen 13:37:20, 2005-08-09 (UTC)
See Talk:Struma#Naming.
You are missing a very important point here. Regardless if it is Struma or Strymon, the discharge of this river is way beyond 76 thousand cubic meters per second. For your information the discharge of Mississippi is a meager 13 thousand cubic meters per second. Please fix your numbers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.126.228.33 ( talk) 16:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
I just wanted to ask if anyone can find a better map. I clicked on the map, but I still could make no sense of it. Maybe my eyes are getting old, but even with my glasses on this map was not helpful to me. Sorry if I have put this comment in the wrong place. Wikipedia has changed itself a bit, so I can no longer comment directly on the talk page. Please! Better map? I speak not as an editor but as a user. 46.12.92.230 ( talk) 21:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is it really proper to move this to Struma? Is there a regular English term for it? In my experience it is always Strymon, but that's mostly from reading references to it in the context of ancient Greece. (Google gets 594 results for "Strymon River" and 641 for "Struma River", by the way.) Adam Bishop 13:37, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
How can it go 400 km south if it's only 290 km long? The other way around would make sense. However, another possibility is that one or both numbers are incorrect. Jeroen 13:37:20, 2005-08-09 (UTC)
See Talk:Struma#Naming.
You are missing a very important point here. Regardless if it is Struma or Strymon, the discharge of this river is way beyond 76 thousand cubic meters per second. For your information the discharge of Mississippi is a meager 13 thousand cubic meters per second. Please fix your numbers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.126.228.33 ( talk) 16:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
I just wanted to ask if anyone can find a better map. I clicked on the map, but I still could make no sense of it. Maybe my eyes are getting old, but even with my glasses on this map was not helpful to me. Sorry if I have put this comment in the wrong place. Wikipedia has changed itself a bit, so I can no longer comment directly on the talk page. Please! Better map? I speak not as an editor but as a user. 46.12.92.230 ( talk) 21:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)