This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Robotics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anna.bergstrom, Mackjohnson77, Jvsaghi, Kwright1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 10:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

there is a new disambiguation page: Structure from motion (disambiguation). Thus this article should be renamed, for instance, "Structure from motion (computer vision)". I was unable to do it, please help. Also the disambiguation page should be edited to reflect the new name.

Autodesk 123D catch is a free hobby App to capture Struction from motion images, its a cloud app for iPhone 4 and newer and for the new iPads, can i ad that to the applications list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.195.234.67 ( talk) 03:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC) reply

For me it is completely unclear where the difference between these two methods are. Or if they have something in common. Well, in other words, I see many people saying they are doing SfM but what I see is photogrammetry. Also in the photogrammetry article i see references of SfM as if it is just another designation for it. I'm jsut confused -- Patribus ( talk) 19:05, 23 July 2016 (UTC) reply

I think the section on SfM for the geosciences could be edited. Particularly, there can be a citation added to the comparison of the data quality between SfM and lidar. This paper tests both methods: ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications ^[1] Anna.bergstrom ( talk) 17:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC) reply