This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Both the Stratford Works and this article needs a lot of work. There's a lot of material in this article that does not have inline citations, WP:V far too much detail (lists of loco allocations in 1922, for example) WP:NOTDATABASE and a fair bit of what I suspect is copyrighted material (Text from the souvenir brochure for the TMD Open Day, for example). WP:COPYVIO Whether the sources that are listed are reliable is another thing worth looking at. WP:NOR If anyone desperately cares for this article, feel free to make a start on fixing this - otherwise just a heads up that I may return in a few weeks to cut chunks from these articles that fail basic Wikipedia standards... Turini2 ( talk) 20:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Define excessive? I think the allocation of engines to an engine shed is a key part of the story and its a summary of how that changed over the years.
— User: Davidvaughanwells 08:40, November 20, 2021 (UTC)
Its been there for several years and no one has yet objected and I am aware of at least two editors who have looked at the page and not found it a problem
— User: Davidvaughanwells 08:40, November 20, 2021 (UTC)
I thought about the copyrighted material but seeing it was out there on the web anyway and the organisation that produced it does not exist and it was a leaflet rather than a book then who exactly is going to object?
— User:Davidvaughanwells 08:40, November 20, 2021 (UTC)
You also suggest there is more copyrighted material - such as?
— User:Davidvaughanwells 08:40, November 20, 2021 (UTC)
You also mention original research - my main sources are the GER society journals, the books I own and anything available on the internet
— User:Davidvaughanwells 08:40, November 20, 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Both the Stratford Works and this article needs a lot of work. There's a lot of material in this article that does not have inline citations, WP:V far too much detail (lists of loco allocations in 1922, for example) WP:NOTDATABASE and a fair bit of what I suspect is copyrighted material (Text from the souvenir brochure for the TMD Open Day, for example). WP:COPYVIO Whether the sources that are listed are reliable is another thing worth looking at. WP:NOR If anyone desperately cares for this article, feel free to make a start on fixing this - otherwise just a heads up that I may return in a few weeks to cut chunks from these articles that fail basic Wikipedia standards... Turini2 ( talk) 20:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Define excessive? I think the allocation of engines to an engine shed is a key part of the story and its a summary of how that changed over the years.
— User: Davidvaughanwells 08:40, November 20, 2021 (UTC)
Its been there for several years and no one has yet objected and I am aware of at least two editors who have looked at the page and not found it a problem
— User: Davidvaughanwells 08:40, November 20, 2021 (UTC)
I thought about the copyrighted material but seeing it was out there on the web anyway and the organisation that produced it does not exist and it was a leaflet rather than a book then who exactly is going to object?
— User:Davidvaughanwells 08:40, November 20, 2021 (UTC)
You also suggest there is more copyrighted material - such as?
— User:Davidvaughanwells 08:40, November 20, 2021 (UTC)
You also mention original research - my main sources are the GER society journals, the books I own and anything available on the internet
— User:Davidvaughanwells 08:40, November 20, 2021 (UTC)