![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Having checked the guidelines, I'd say this might qualify for C-Class status now. Just wondering if anyone had any objections to that? Sgreen93 ( talk) 23:15, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience |
---|---|---|
C | The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial
cleanup. The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. |
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. |
Start | An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources. The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability, and provide enough sources to establish verifiability. |
Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more. |
Whilst it may be that chain as a unit of measurement survive on railways, no-one bar a tiny minority know what it means. It's unhelpful and confusing and unnecessary. Use yards, 86.176.158.132 ( talk) 23:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Would the opening date of Platform 5 be considered a key date for this station? I.e. does it belong in the sidebar.
DAB ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Having checked the guidelines, I'd say this might qualify for C-Class status now. Just wondering if anyone had any objections to that? Sgreen93 ( talk) 23:15, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience |
---|---|---|
C | The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial
cleanup. The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. |
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. |
Start | An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources. The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability, and provide enough sources to establish verifiability. |
Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more. |
Whilst it may be that chain as a unit of measurement survive on railways, no-one bar a tiny minority know what it means. It's unhelpful and confusing and unnecessary. Use yards, 86.176.158.132 ( talk) 23:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Would the opening date of Platform 5 be considered a key date for this station? I.e. does it belong in the sidebar.
DAB ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)