The lead as it stands doesn't really cover the film's production, which it should to give a broad overview of the article. I suggest a third paragraph, between the two existing ones, with at least a sentence each for development, filming, post-production, and music. You should especially talk about the three different filming styles for the three acts, and the three different music styles for the three acts, and you should probably note that Sorkin created most of the dialogue himself. Done
Like I said, I really think this paragraph should note that the dialogue is almost all fictional, and the cinematography for the three acts. -
adamstom97 (
talk)
21:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Production
The first line of development should be combined with the next paragraph. Done
The development section should introduce Jobs and Isaacson's book, assuming that some readers will skip to the production section. Done
Sorkin, Jobs, and Fassbender shouldn't be linked again in the filming section. Done
Music
The second paragraph needs a copy edit, as it currently doesn't make complete sense. Done
This section should be a subsection of the reception section, as it is in response to the film, and really should be expanded. Is there no other information available? Done
I'm frankly not the greatest in way of archiving sources. I'll message a few editors to see if someone could aid me with that. 17:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Rusted AutoParts
I'm needing a bit more time in way of learning to archive (a method I was informed about involves my email, which im hesistant on using for security reason, could be misguided worry, but still). Is there a deadline you'd like to set for this GA to be wrapped up?
Rusted AutoParts18:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Usually they should be done in a week, but I'm happy to give you more time since I can see that you are actively trying to get this passed. As long as it is within reason, really. -
adamstom97 (
talk)
21:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
I know it can be a bit of a pain, but it is important to have archive links in case any of these sources go off-line. Hopefully it is a habit that more and more editors are getting into. -
adamstom97 (
talk)
23:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The lead as it stands doesn't really cover the film's production, which it should to give a broad overview of the article. I suggest a third paragraph, between the two existing ones, with at least a sentence each for development, filming, post-production, and music. You should especially talk about the three different filming styles for the three acts, and the three different music styles for the three acts, and you should probably note that Sorkin created most of the dialogue himself. Done
Like I said, I really think this paragraph should note that the dialogue is almost all fictional, and the cinematography for the three acts. -
adamstom97 (
talk)
21:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Production
The first line of development should be combined with the next paragraph. Done
The development section should introduce Jobs and Isaacson's book, assuming that some readers will skip to the production section. Done
Sorkin, Jobs, and Fassbender shouldn't be linked again in the filming section. Done
Music
The second paragraph needs a copy edit, as it currently doesn't make complete sense. Done
This section should be a subsection of the reception section, as it is in response to the film, and really should be expanded. Is there no other information available? Done
I'm frankly not the greatest in way of archiving sources. I'll message a few editors to see if someone could aid me with that. 17:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Rusted AutoParts
I'm needing a bit more time in way of learning to archive (a method I was informed about involves my email, which im hesistant on using for security reason, could be misguided worry, but still). Is there a deadline you'd like to set for this GA to be wrapped up?
Rusted AutoParts18:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Usually they should be done in a week, but I'm happy to give you more time since I can see that you are actively trying to get this passed. As long as it is within reason, really. -
adamstom97 (
talk)
21:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
I know it can be a bit of a pain, but it is important to have archive links in case any of these sources go off-line. Hopefully it is a habit that more and more editors are getting into. -
adamstom97 (
talk)
23:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply