From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

k-word debate

A short piece on Hofmeyr's current stupid k-word discussion should be added. [1] 178.24.252.101 ( talk) 16:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Discography

This article's discography section is particularly detailed (with each album's tracks being listed). It adds a lot of unnecessary length to the article, resulting in it becoming uncomfortable to read and navigate. Could the track listings not perhaps be omitted, or a separate Steve Hofmeyr Discography article be created? Knyzna1 ( talk) 19:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC) reply

I don't think I've ever seen all the tracks of albums being included in discographies elsewhere on WP, so I agree that they should be removed here. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 22:21, 22 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Impartiality

This article seriously needs to be checked for neutral point of view,especially " controversies " section,example " ... which has led various journalists and public figures to label him a "disgrace to South Africa " and it;s given source to a letter of protest from some guy,that's way bellow factual standards of wikipedia . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.40.10.122 ( talk) 17:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

k-word debate

A short piece on Hofmeyr's current stupid k-word discussion should be added. [1] 178.24.252.101 ( talk) 16:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Discography

This article's discography section is particularly detailed (with each album's tracks being listed). It adds a lot of unnecessary length to the article, resulting in it becoming uncomfortable to read and navigate. Could the track listings not perhaps be omitted, or a separate Steve Hofmeyr Discography article be created? Knyzna1 ( talk) 19:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC) reply

I don't think I've ever seen all the tracks of albums being included in discographies elsewhere on WP, so I agree that they should be removed here. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 22:21, 22 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Impartiality

This article seriously needs to be checked for neutral point of view,especially " controversies " section,example " ... which has led various journalists and public figures to label him a "disgrace to South Africa " and it;s given source to a letter of protest from some guy,that's way bellow factual standards of wikipedia . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.40.10.122 ( talk) 17:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook