This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
all the info in this article is unsourced. Whitemensburden 22:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm... methinks he's editing the page himself today. Either that or his producers. GRX Dragon ( talk) 13:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
There is too much vandelism going on. -- Purpleslog ( talk) 13:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
That's because Steve Doocy and/or his producer(s) is/are editing the page while on-air and having fun doing so. GRX Dragon ( talk) 13:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
SD age has been listed here as being 51, being born in 1956. However, he himself claims to be 67. I don't know his actual BD but unless sources can be found to verify it should not be included. Also, there is no evidence to him being Catholic, or doing some of the stuff people claim he has done.
Arzel (
talk)
04:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
I removed the external link to MMfA. It only serves to criticize Doocy, and does not offer a balanced view. Per WP:EL and WP:BLP and probably most specifically under WP:UNDUE it does not belong. Save for a moment that some feel it does belong, then by what means does one decide which belong? What makes MMfA so special that their criticism deserves special mention? By this logic we should have stories on Doocy from every source available. Arzel ( talk) 05:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Shall the following remain in the article?:
---
{{
cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(
help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(
help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(
help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
link)
{{
cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)
---
My take is that it is now receiving national attention, is very well referenced and it is ironically the only referenced content of this entire article.-- Oakshade ( talk) 23:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
(undent) I see rather than waiting for additional comments you simply reinserted the text. Jon Stewerts opinion is not relevant. He mocks people all of the time in a satirical manner, and via BLP, WP should not serve to mock a living person. In addition this is undue weight given to his (JS's) comments which havn't been notable in MSM. As I said before the CBS link is actually a blog redirect, it is NOT CBS news, it is the words of a partisan. Please try to look at this from an objective point of view. Arzel ( talk) 04:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Does it really matter who Peter Doocy plans to vote for? This not the Peter Doocy article. Lots42 ( talk) 19:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
How does Steve Doocy qualify as a journalist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.246.140.21 ( talk) 04:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Under the section "personal life", it says that Steve Doocy is a practicing "coprophiliac"... that can't be right. Toadspring ( talk) 16:08, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Whats up with the salarything here... strange. Remove? Herr X ( talk) 12:56, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
I removed some stuff about worst person in the world and lunch and nap habits. -- Tom (talk) 21:03, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
there should be some reference added regarding the infamous "potted up on weed" remark that has been ridiculed by the rest of the media. http://jezebel.com/5958575/fox--friends-anchor-hilariously-worries-about-nation-getting-potted-up-after-marijuana-legalization — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.210.233.156 ( talk) 23:27, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Does the man really pronounce his last name /ˈduːʃi/? Because I can read the IPA and that clearly comes out sounding as "doo-shee", i.e. " douchey". If that's actually how he pronounces it, that's fine, but I can't help but think this is subtle vandalism to call him a douchebag. Lockesdonkey ( talk) 17:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
where is Steve Doocy and Gretchen Carlson harassment lawsuit which has been just settled? The whole topic has evaporated from his wiki. http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/07/gretchen-carlson-files-lawsuit-against-roger-ailes-alleging-sexual-harassment-225162
-- 2600:8800:FF04:C00:E98E:504E:508B:6A89 ( talk) 14:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
today http://fortune.com/2016/09/06/fox-gretchen-carlson-settlement-apology/
-- 2600:8800:FF04:C00:E98E:504E:508B:6A89 ( talk) 17:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Steve Doocy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:38, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
added cookbooks 65.215.66.106 ( talk) 15:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Did not need to start discussion on this, next time add description to edit summary before publishing
50.250.86.203 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 12:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
This section was out of order and out of date. Nobody starts in TV in New York. Located his bio and fixed chronology
50.250.86.203 ( talk) 12:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Agreed, years out of date. Looks like part updated, but the lawsuit stuff was not. Agree with REBBING in a previous talk discussion on the topic that the entire item is inappropriate given Wiki's longstanding BLP policy that allegations in lawsuits are not included bz they are unproven and unsworn. Surprised it's remained published this long
Thoughts?
I concur — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
96.88.115.177 (
talk)
11:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Steve Doocy is uniquely telegenic. His career requires a physical appearance and personal qualities that are deemed highly appealing.
But this entry is less about Steve Doocy than it is about the need for a better description of his career.
Doocy is described as an American television host, political commentator, and author. It is more precise to describe an employee (or owner in Doocy's case) as someone who relays information subordinated to corporate interests or more mildly is obedient to authority. An oversimplification perhaps of the actual details of the work but nevertheless a directive that isn't subordinate to any other.
Consider that the use of obvious perjoratives (or not) but nearly meaningless terms like honesty, left, right, center, conservative are not proffered in this entry to describe Doocy or his career. This is not a short shrift of the subject's humanity or biography.
A historical context or rough comparison to another broadcaster is meaningful. A comparison to Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf in the early days of the Iraq war.
Doocy was on Fox and Friends delivering the assigned promulgations and entertainment but instead of the sounds of bombs that accented al-Shahhafs final broadcasts, there is nothing but silence in following years with Doocy's programming. The US saw large numbers of former military but also larger amounts of the general population killing themselves variously (increasingly with fentanyl), foreclosures, unemployment, corruption, criminality and dramatic urban rioting.
A subjective evaluation of Steve Doocy is best left to the reader but the hope is that this entry provides more clarity on Doocy's career.
Steve Duce cld u plz keep ur excitement of President Trump off camera . U r not for him but i dont need to see u all smiles and slant discussions against him keep ur excitement off my TV u r my least favorite.. 2600:8807:2D0A:CC00:4932:9D2E:F20F:E796 ( talk) 12:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
all the info in this article is unsourced. Whitemensburden 22:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm... methinks he's editing the page himself today. Either that or his producers. GRX Dragon ( talk) 13:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
There is too much vandelism going on. -- Purpleslog ( talk) 13:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
That's because Steve Doocy and/or his producer(s) is/are editing the page while on-air and having fun doing so. GRX Dragon ( talk) 13:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
SD age has been listed here as being 51, being born in 1956. However, he himself claims to be 67. I don't know his actual BD but unless sources can be found to verify it should not be included. Also, there is no evidence to him being Catholic, or doing some of the stuff people claim he has done.
Arzel (
talk)
04:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
I removed the external link to MMfA. It only serves to criticize Doocy, and does not offer a balanced view. Per WP:EL and WP:BLP and probably most specifically under WP:UNDUE it does not belong. Save for a moment that some feel it does belong, then by what means does one decide which belong? What makes MMfA so special that their criticism deserves special mention? By this logic we should have stories on Doocy from every source available. Arzel ( talk) 05:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Shall the following remain in the article?:
---
{{
cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(
help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(
help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(
help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
link)
{{
cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)
---
My take is that it is now receiving national attention, is very well referenced and it is ironically the only referenced content of this entire article.-- Oakshade ( talk) 23:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
(undent) I see rather than waiting for additional comments you simply reinserted the text. Jon Stewerts opinion is not relevant. He mocks people all of the time in a satirical manner, and via BLP, WP should not serve to mock a living person. In addition this is undue weight given to his (JS's) comments which havn't been notable in MSM. As I said before the CBS link is actually a blog redirect, it is NOT CBS news, it is the words of a partisan. Please try to look at this from an objective point of view. Arzel ( talk) 04:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Does it really matter who Peter Doocy plans to vote for? This not the Peter Doocy article. Lots42 ( talk) 19:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
How does Steve Doocy qualify as a journalist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.246.140.21 ( talk) 04:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Under the section "personal life", it says that Steve Doocy is a practicing "coprophiliac"... that can't be right. Toadspring ( talk) 16:08, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Whats up with the salarything here... strange. Remove? Herr X ( talk) 12:56, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
I removed some stuff about worst person in the world and lunch and nap habits. -- Tom (talk) 21:03, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
there should be some reference added regarding the infamous "potted up on weed" remark that has been ridiculed by the rest of the media. http://jezebel.com/5958575/fox--friends-anchor-hilariously-worries-about-nation-getting-potted-up-after-marijuana-legalization — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.210.233.156 ( talk) 23:27, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Does the man really pronounce his last name /ˈduːʃi/? Because I can read the IPA and that clearly comes out sounding as "doo-shee", i.e. " douchey". If that's actually how he pronounces it, that's fine, but I can't help but think this is subtle vandalism to call him a douchebag. Lockesdonkey ( talk) 17:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
where is Steve Doocy and Gretchen Carlson harassment lawsuit which has been just settled? The whole topic has evaporated from his wiki. http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/07/gretchen-carlson-files-lawsuit-against-roger-ailes-alleging-sexual-harassment-225162
-- 2600:8800:FF04:C00:E98E:504E:508B:6A89 ( talk) 14:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
today http://fortune.com/2016/09/06/fox-gretchen-carlson-settlement-apology/
-- 2600:8800:FF04:C00:E98E:504E:508B:6A89 ( talk) 17:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Steve Doocy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:38, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
added cookbooks 65.215.66.106 ( talk) 15:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Did not need to start discussion on this, next time add description to edit summary before publishing
50.250.86.203 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 12:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
This section was out of order and out of date. Nobody starts in TV in New York. Located his bio and fixed chronology
50.250.86.203 ( talk) 12:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Agreed, years out of date. Looks like part updated, but the lawsuit stuff was not. Agree with REBBING in a previous talk discussion on the topic that the entire item is inappropriate given Wiki's longstanding BLP policy that allegations in lawsuits are not included bz they are unproven and unsworn. Surprised it's remained published this long
Thoughts?
I concur — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
96.88.115.177 (
talk)
11:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Steve Doocy is uniquely telegenic. His career requires a physical appearance and personal qualities that are deemed highly appealing.
But this entry is less about Steve Doocy than it is about the need for a better description of his career.
Doocy is described as an American television host, political commentator, and author. It is more precise to describe an employee (or owner in Doocy's case) as someone who relays information subordinated to corporate interests or more mildly is obedient to authority. An oversimplification perhaps of the actual details of the work but nevertheless a directive that isn't subordinate to any other.
Consider that the use of obvious perjoratives (or not) but nearly meaningless terms like honesty, left, right, center, conservative are not proffered in this entry to describe Doocy or his career. This is not a short shrift of the subject's humanity or biography.
A historical context or rough comparison to another broadcaster is meaningful. A comparison to Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf in the early days of the Iraq war.
Doocy was on Fox and Friends delivering the assigned promulgations and entertainment but instead of the sounds of bombs that accented al-Shahhafs final broadcasts, there is nothing but silence in following years with Doocy's programming. The US saw large numbers of former military but also larger amounts of the general population killing themselves variously (increasingly with fentanyl), foreclosures, unemployment, corruption, criminality and dramatic urban rioting.
A subjective evaluation of Steve Doocy is best left to the reader but the hope is that this entry provides more clarity on Doocy's career.
Steve Duce cld u plz keep ur excitement of President Trump off camera . U r not for him but i dont need to see u all smiles and slant discussions against him keep ur excitement off my TV u r my least favorite.. 2600:8807:2D0A:CC00:4932:9D2E:F20F:E796 ( talk) 12:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC)