This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Philosophy: Philosophers / Contemporary Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophers Contemporary philosophy

I think that Stephen Menn is sufficiently notable to qualify for Wikipedia. He is now a senior faculty member at Humboldt-Berlin. I cleaned up his page and removed the outdated publication list. If I have the energy I'll add more content on his substantive views sometime soon. Dmoerner ( talk) 05:26, 27 February 2013 (UTC) reply

I agree, I think he does sufficiently qualify. -- Cessator ( talk) 18:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC) reply