This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Stephanie Seymour article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
She is so beautiful that it's a shame that no picture is included in the article
Did she born in 1968 or 1969? 114.25.248.230 ( talk) 11:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Do we feel this should be included in the article? Is it not rumor and gossip? -- BwB ( talk) 14:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
I think this is worth mentioning. It's been covered extensively in the news and there is photographic evidence of them kissing. Examples:
Perhaps a sub-section under personal life titled "beach controversy with son"? Ranze ( talk) 20:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Judaism? Conversion to judaism from marriage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.92.113.139 ( talk) 02:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
what a train wreck ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.184.250.10 ( talk) 14:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Stephanie Seymour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://lifestyle.sg.msn.com/Fashion/celebrity/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3287639When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
The characterization of this relationship seems to endorse one which is, at the very least, potentially illegal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:F90:6950:1CD2:435E:F3ED:32DD ( talk) 17:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Stephanie Seymour article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
She is so beautiful that it's a shame that no picture is included in the article
Did she born in 1968 or 1969? 114.25.248.230 ( talk) 11:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Do we feel this should be included in the article? Is it not rumor and gossip? -- BwB ( talk) 14:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
I think this is worth mentioning. It's been covered extensively in the news and there is photographic evidence of them kissing. Examples:
Perhaps a sub-section under personal life titled "beach controversy with son"? Ranze ( talk) 20:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Judaism? Conversion to judaism from marriage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.92.113.139 ( talk) 02:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
what a train wreck ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.184.250.10 ( talk) 14:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Stephanie Seymour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://lifestyle.sg.msn.com/Fashion/celebrity/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3287639When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
The characterization of this relationship seems to endorse one which is, at the very least, potentially illegal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:F90:6950:1CD2:435E:F3ED:32DD ( talk) 17:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)