This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about
soap operas and
telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit
WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the
discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Unsourced returns claim removed
There is no source for the claims that Steph will return them, and as that section of the article described in great detail an episode that has yet to air, I can only assume it's someone making up stories. I've removed the section.
Smurfmeister (
talk) 11:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Steph Forsythe vs Steph Stokes
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I am proposing that this article be moved to Steph Stokes because it is her
WP:COMMONNAME. This article appears to have been moved because of the classic "this character got married lets reflect that in the title" scenario. Steph Forsythe is not how this character is remembered - for instance the news of her return in which she is referred to as Stokes.
Rainthe 1 12:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)reply
The article should be Steph Stokes. As you pointed out it's her WP:COMMONNAME and the article was clearly moved because of her marriage, which isn't a good enough reason. Her major storylines occurred while she was called Stokes and she was married for a year/less than a year. I think the Google/news hits would be higher for Stokes and, as you said, her return announcement calls her Steph Stokes. -
JuneGloomTalk 16:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about
soap operas and
telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit
WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the
discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Unsourced returns claim removed
There is no source for the claims that Steph will return them, and as that section of the article described in great detail an episode that has yet to air, I can only assume it's someone making up stories. I've removed the section.
Smurfmeister (
talk) 11:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Steph Forsythe vs Steph Stokes
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I am proposing that this article be moved to Steph Stokes because it is her
WP:COMMONNAME. This article appears to have been moved because of the classic "this character got married lets reflect that in the title" scenario. Steph Forsythe is not how this character is remembered - for instance the news of her return in which she is referred to as Stokes.
Rainthe 1 12:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)reply
The article should be Steph Stokes. As you pointed out it's her WP:COMMONNAME and the article was clearly moved because of her marriage, which isn't a good enough reason. Her major storylines occurred while she was called Stokes and she was married for a year/less than a year. I think the Google/news hits would be higher for Stokes and, as you said, her return announcement calls her Steph Stokes. -
JuneGloomTalk 16:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.