This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Requested move 7 June 2016
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment: Note that this seems to be a malformed multi-page move request, or perhaps a deletion request, as the destination name is already occupied. There is no clear suggestion of what should be done with the current
Stenbock dab page. Is it suggested to just delete it (since most of its entries are part of the family) or to move it? There has been no notification on the talk page of the dab page to indicate that a move or deletion of that dab page has been proposed. —
BarrelProof (
talk)
15:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The suggestion is to delete it, move this article to Stenbock, and add Stenbock House as a See also entry. All of the other entries on the dab are already listed here.
Nick Number (
talk)
16:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
I just placed a notice at
Talk:Stenbock to inform anyone watching that page that it has been proposed to be deleted in this discussion. I suggest that the discussion here should be kept open for at least a few more days to allow for the possibility that someone might see that notice and want to come here and comment on the proposal. —
BarrelProof (
talk)
16:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Support per nom, since all people listed at
Stenbock are members of that family. Two separate pages make no sense, and a see also/hatnote seems reasonable to deal with the house. --
Tavix(
talk)22:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Requested move 7 June 2016
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment: Note that this seems to be a malformed multi-page move request, or perhaps a deletion request, as the destination name is already occupied. There is no clear suggestion of what should be done with the current
Stenbock dab page. Is it suggested to just delete it (since most of its entries are part of the family) or to move it? There has been no notification on the talk page of the dab page to indicate that a move or deletion of that dab page has been proposed. —
BarrelProof (
talk)
15:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The suggestion is to delete it, move this article to Stenbock, and add Stenbock House as a See also entry. All of the other entries on the dab are already listed here.
Nick Number (
talk)
16:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
I just placed a notice at
Talk:Stenbock to inform anyone watching that page that it has been proposed to be deleted in this discussion. I suggest that the discussion here should be kept open for at least a few more days to allow for the possibility that someone might see that notice and want to come here and comment on the proposal. —
BarrelProof (
talk)
16:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Support per nom, since all people listed at
Stenbock are members of that family. Two separate pages make no sense, and a see also/hatnote seems reasonable to deal with the house. --
Tavix(
talk)22:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.