![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
We need an expert to interpret the interesting commentary left behind by a certain "old journalist" at the bottom of the article, and to help integrate that information into the article. Hyxl4161 ( talk) 15:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Or at least define your terms--what the hell are W, m, and K in this context? āPreceding unsigned comment added by 216.56.28.38 ( talk) 23:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC) \
I have here an article (Rabl, 1976 Comparison of solar collectors, Solar Energy (18) 93-111) which states that emitters emit nĀ² as much radiation when immersed in a medium of refractive index n. This article goes on to state that the definition of the Stefan-Boltzmann 'constant' is
How can we reconcile the present article with that asserted 'fact'? Jdpipe ( talk) 02:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Withdrawn. I missed the bar on the h-bar. Joemarasco ( talk) 21:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC) Joemarasco ( talk) 19:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Unless I'm mistaken, CODATA publishes the constants every four years, making 2018 the most recent. The wording suggests that there was a change in 2019, but I couldn't find any source to back this up. The expression for the stefan-boltzmann constant most likely was a reference to the 2014 CODATA paper [1][here]. But is it even necessary to include this? Other articles such as for the Planck constant do not even mention 2014 data. Ā Ī¤heQ EditorĀ Talk? 01:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Since this article is mostly just a list of constants, I looked up where that "15" (or "60") comes from... So, when you integrate over all wavelengths
where
You'll eventually get to an integral like this:
... which is exactly Try it out on Wolfram Alpha... [Integrate[y^3/(-1 + E^y), {y, 0, Infinity}]
This is where I'm getting this from: http://www.hanksville.org/courseware/bb/SBLaw.html āĀ Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.184.203.108 ( talk) 09:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
We need an expert to interpret the interesting commentary left behind by a certain "old journalist" at the bottom of the article, and to help integrate that information into the article. Hyxl4161 ( talk) 15:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Or at least define your terms--what the hell are W, m, and K in this context? āPreceding unsigned comment added by 216.56.28.38 ( talk) 23:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC) \
I have here an article (Rabl, 1976 Comparison of solar collectors, Solar Energy (18) 93-111) which states that emitters emit nĀ² as much radiation when immersed in a medium of refractive index n. This article goes on to state that the definition of the Stefan-Boltzmann 'constant' is
How can we reconcile the present article with that asserted 'fact'? Jdpipe ( talk) 02:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Withdrawn. I missed the bar on the h-bar. Joemarasco ( talk) 21:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC) Joemarasco ( talk) 19:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Unless I'm mistaken, CODATA publishes the constants every four years, making 2018 the most recent. The wording suggests that there was a change in 2019, but I couldn't find any source to back this up. The expression for the stefan-boltzmann constant most likely was a reference to the 2014 CODATA paper [1][here]. But is it even necessary to include this? Other articles such as for the Planck constant do not even mention 2014 data. Ā Ī¤heQ EditorĀ Talk? 01:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Since this article is mostly just a list of constants, I looked up where that "15" (or "60") comes from... So, when you integrate over all wavelengths
where
You'll eventually get to an integral like this:
... which is exactly Try it out on Wolfram Alpha... [Integrate[y^3/(-1 + E^y), {y, 0, Infinity}]
This is where I'm getting this from: http://www.hanksville.org/courseware/bb/SBLaw.html āĀ Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.184.203.108 ( talk) 09:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)