This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article is wildly misleading in its opening statements. Not all subordinate legislation is found in statutory instruments, they are a particular kind of legislative instrument. The article appears to completely miss that point. Francis Davey 12:42, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
It might be helpful if this article included some comparisons (or at least cross-references) to analogous delegated law-making processes in other legal systems, such as Presidential decrees in many countries, and rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act in the United States. 121a0012 20:12, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
I think any such comparison (and I agree one is needed) would be betetr placed in the delegated legislation article. Dmvward ( talk) 12:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
This is actually a very well written article and is higly accurate. The sources provided at the bottom of the page confirm most of the information on the page itself. I don't understand why there is a notice at the top of the page asking for verification? Captainj 09:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Given that, as the Article itself admits, not just the UK has Statutory Instruments shouldn't it be either be more generalised or renamed to Statutory Instrument (United Kingdom). Caveat lector 17:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
I have done a major rewrite of this article with the aim of improving both content and structure. Dmvward ( talk) 12:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Why does the box list 2011 twice? and why can't it be edited? andycjp ( talk) 10:47, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Could someone revert the move to Statutory Instrument (Great Britain)? This is wildly confusing as. UK SI's are almost always produced by the UK Parliament and will often have UK wide scope. There may be a case for A Great Britain specific page, but this isn't it and I doubt it. The move was not discussed at all. Francis Davey ( talk) 16:24, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Statutory instrument (UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:04, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article is wildly misleading in its opening statements. Not all subordinate legislation is found in statutory instruments, they are a particular kind of legislative instrument. The article appears to completely miss that point. Francis Davey 12:42, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
It might be helpful if this article included some comparisons (or at least cross-references) to analogous delegated law-making processes in other legal systems, such as Presidential decrees in many countries, and rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act in the United States. 121a0012 20:12, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
I think any such comparison (and I agree one is needed) would be betetr placed in the delegated legislation article. Dmvward ( talk) 12:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
This is actually a very well written article and is higly accurate. The sources provided at the bottom of the page confirm most of the information on the page itself. I don't understand why there is a notice at the top of the page asking for verification? Captainj 09:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Given that, as the Article itself admits, not just the UK has Statutory Instruments shouldn't it be either be more generalised or renamed to Statutory Instrument (United Kingdom). Caveat lector 17:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
I have done a major rewrite of this article with the aim of improving both content and structure. Dmvward ( talk) 12:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Why does the box list 2011 twice? and why can't it be edited? andycjp ( talk) 10:47, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Could someone revert the move to Statutory Instrument (Great Britain)? This is wildly confusing as. UK SI's are almost always produced by the UK Parliament and will often have UK wide scope. There may be a case for A Great Britain specific page, but this isn't it and I doubt it. The move was not discussed at all. Francis Davey ( talk) 16:24, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Statutory instrument (UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:04, 3 September 2017 (UTC)