This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver / History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia. This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver. This article is supported by WikiProject History of Canada. Sculpture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles Visual arts: Public art This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles This article is supported by the public art task force.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

I am not going to formally suggest a merger at this time, but do we really need an article for the statute and a separate one for John Deighton himself? Couldn't this be appropriately covered in one article? I will put a note on that article too and we can discuss.-- Darryl Kerrigan ( talk) 20:46, 18 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Oppose merge. I write about public art and sculpture often and there's enough coverage for a standalone article. There's nothing wrong with a stub, just needs to be expanded. --- Another Believer _{( Talk)} 21:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC) reply

I did some rework of the article, mostly curating the summary in the lede, and moving and adding some detail (taken from the John Deighton article) into the "History" subsection. I hope it's agreed that the old version [1] is improved upon with the new version [2].

I kept reference to the same sources, as I cutted and pasted, but I didn't review things to see that the references made sense regarding their position among the text. Even before, there seemed to be cites that weren't quite attached closely to the statements they were supporting. I promise to review that later. Cheers. _signed, Willondon ( talk) 02:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC) reply

 Done _signed, Willondon ( talk) 23:15, 18 February 2022 (UTC) reply