This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Weasel words: "although there are allegations that it serves more to protect and preserve the existence and continuation of the ruling regime." No source cited.
Non-neutral point of view: "The SSI mission appears to be arresting and torturing the ruling regime's enemies and, in return, the regime apparently gives the SSI benefits and powers with no limits." Again, no source cited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.97.10.52 ( talk) 20:32, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Agree - same organization-- Degen Earthfast ( talk) 14:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
The US Diplomatic cable in the Guardian article appears to be talking about the regular police in Egypt. Nowhere does it specifically mention the SSI. This is like conflating local police with the FBI. Michaeltaft ( talk) 03:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Seems like it's in good faith, and you're on top of checking into it. It stays for now. Michaeltaft ( talk) 07:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The article says the head of SSI was arrested, but does not name him. Why? For how long was he responsible for this organization? Is there an article about him? AngBent ( talk) 19:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Why are there only Human-Rights-Watchish style of sources without any professional independent references? 188.244.47.2 ( talk) 01:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Weasel words: "although there are allegations that it serves more to protect and preserve the existence and continuation of the ruling regime." No source cited.
Non-neutral point of view: "The SSI mission appears to be arresting and torturing the ruling regime's enemies and, in return, the regime apparently gives the SSI benefits and powers with no limits." Again, no source cited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.97.10.52 ( talk) 20:32, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Agree - same organization-- Degen Earthfast ( talk) 14:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
The US Diplomatic cable in the Guardian article appears to be talking about the regular police in Egypt. Nowhere does it specifically mention the SSI. This is like conflating local police with the FBI. Michaeltaft ( talk) 03:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Seems like it's in good faith, and you're on top of checking into it. It stays for now. Michaeltaft ( talk) 07:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The article says the head of SSI was arrested, but does not name him. Why? For how long was he responsible for this organization? Is there an article about him? AngBent ( talk) 19:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Why are there only Human-Rights-Watchish style of sources without any professional independent references? 188.244.47.2 ( talk) 01:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)