This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The following citation and statement are outdated and do not provide a factual statement, rather an opinion of political analyst/writer: "SOFAZ lacks transparency in its finances and in its contracting, which has raised questions about corruption.[2][1] Critics have described projects funded by SOFAZ as useless, and noted that contracts have been awarded to companies owned by the ruling Aliyev family in Azerbaijan.[2]"
I suggest it be changed to the factual statement:
"SOFAZ has received an overall score of 92 and has been ranked 5th among 64 sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) in the 2019 Sovereign Wealth Fund Transparency and Accountability scoreboard published by the Peterson Institute for International Economics"
Source material: https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/documents/pb21-3.pdf OngoTard ( talk) 08:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, @ Thenightaway. Why did you revert my tags? I have checked the references and some of them don't include the information provided -- leilahuseynova ( talk) 09:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
SOFAZ has been criticized for lacking transparency in its finances and in its contracting, which has raised questions about corruption— where is it? The reference say
transparency applies only to the income side of Azerbaijan's oil fund while the expenditure side remains opaquewhich is completely different than the interpretation. Also, you haven't provided the page for the reference #17 leilahuseynova ( talk) 09:03, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Made some changes in "Criticism" section based on the references given there and added some information for clarification.-- Wertuose ( talk) 13:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The following citation and statement are outdated and do not provide a factual statement, rather an opinion of political analyst/writer: "SOFAZ lacks transparency in its finances and in its contracting, which has raised questions about corruption.[2][1] Critics have described projects funded by SOFAZ as useless, and noted that contracts have been awarded to companies owned by the ruling Aliyev family in Azerbaijan.[2]"
I suggest it be changed to the factual statement:
"SOFAZ has received an overall score of 92 and has been ranked 5th among 64 sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) in the 2019 Sovereign Wealth Fund Transparency and Accountability scoreboard published by the Peterson Institute for International Economics"
Source material: https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/documents/pb21-3.pdf OngoTard ( talk) 08:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, @ Thenightaway. Why did you revert my tags? I have checked the references and some of them don't include the information provided -- leilahuseynova ( talk) 09:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
SOFAZ has been criticized for lacking transparency in its finances and in its contracting, which has raised questions about corruption— where is it? The reference say
transparency applies only to the income side of Azerbaijan's oil fund while the expenditure side remains opaquewhich is completely different than the interpretation. Also, you haven't provided the page for the reference #17 leilahuseynova ( talk) 09:03, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Made some changes in "Criticism" section based on the references given there and added some information for clarification.-- Wertuose ( talk) 13:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)