![]() | Star Wars and Other Galactic Funk has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 12, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hey, there was also a 15-minute version of the Star Wars disco theme, in addition to the normal 3:32 version. 24.250.1.196 22:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC) "In addition to the normal 3:32 version the album contains a full 15-minute version of the tune." This is incorrect: the album only contains the full length version, as confirmed by the track listing further down the page. The author may be confused with the extended CD releases.
The Will Lee link under personnel does not go to the session bassist but rather the actor who played Mr Hooper on Sesame Street — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.92.43.175 ( talk) 20:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Image:Star Wars Galactic Funk.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Star Wars Galactic Funk.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
There was an excellent Vibraphone solo in the Cantina Band section. No mention in the personnel section of who would have played this. 206.29.176.53 ( talk) 12:54, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
In Spotify the album title is "Music Inspired By Star Wars And Other Galactic Funk". On the cover image you can also see three words above "Star Wars", which could read "Music Inspired By". Maybe this article should be renamed? 80.187.119.43 ( talk) 07:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose ( talk · contribs) 00:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Article has benefited from a copy edit by Baffle gab1978 of the GOCE. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Two uses of Robert Rodriguez's personal site as a reference are appropriate for the material supported. Film School Rejects has been discussed at RSN and seems fine. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | I reiewed the tops few matches found using Earwig's Copyvio Detector and had no concerns. Matches are titles, attributed quotes, and phrases like "number one on the Billboard" that are Ok per WP:LIMITED. No issues found during spot checks. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | I looked over the edit history back to June 2023, when the article was massively expanded, and saw no evidence of edit wars. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | FUR for the album cover is appropriate. The other image is CC. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Images are relevant. Captions are fine. ALT text is also provided. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
I'm happy to discuss, or be challenged on, any of my review comments. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 00:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
of the time".but IMO it would be better to add one after any direct quote. Take this suggestion as an optional one.
I really enjoyed reading this article, great job, MusicforthePeople! I was aware of the single, but had no idea that the album existed and was so successful. As most of the spot checks were fine and the article has already had a good copy-edit, I found very little to say.
![]() | Star Wars and Other Galactic Funk has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 12, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hey, there was also a 15-minute version of the Star Wars disco theme, in addition to the normal 3:32 version. 24.250.1.196 22:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC) "In addition to the normal 3:32 version the album contains a full 15-minute version of the tune." This is incorrect: the album only contains the full length version, as confirmed by the track listing further down the page. The author may be confused with the extended CD releases.
The Will Lee link under personnel does not go to the session bassist but rather the actor who played Mr Hooper on Sesame Street — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.92.43.175 ( talk) 20:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Image:Star Wars Galactic Funk.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Star Wars Galactic Funk.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
There was an excellent Vibraphone solo in the Cantina Band section. No mention in the personnel section of who would have played this. 206.29.176.53 ( talk) 12:54, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
In Spotify the album title is "Music Inspired By Star Wars And Other Galactic Funk". On the cover image you can also see three words above "Star Wars", which could read "Music Inspired By". Maybe this article should be renamed? 80.187.119.43 ( talk) 07:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose ( talk · contribs) 00:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Article has benefited from a copy edit by Baffle gab1978 of the GOCE. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Two uses of Robert Rodriguez's personal site as a reference are appropriate for the material supported. Film School Rejects has been discussed at RSN and seems fine. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | I reiewed the tops few matches found using Earwig's Copyvio Detector and had no concerns. Matches are titles, attributed quotes, and phrases like "number one on the Billboard" that are Ok per WP:LIMITED. No issues found during spot checks. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | I looked over the edit history back to June 2023, when the article was massively expanded, and saw no evidence of edit wars. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | FUR for the album cover is appropriate. The other image is CC. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Images are relevant. Captions are fine. ALT text is also provided. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
I'm happy to discuss, or be challenged on, any of my review comments. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 00:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
of the time".but IMO it would be better to add one after any direct quote. Take this suggestion as an optional one.
I really enjoyed reading this article, great job, MusicforthePeople! I was aware of the single, but had no idea that the album existed and was so successful. As most of the spot checks were fine and the article has already had a good copy-edit, I found very little to say.