This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Star Wars: Young Jedi Adventures article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BaldiBasicsFan, a section for you to discuss your bold edits, and to show supporting consensus and/or guidelines. Cheers. -- Alex_21 TALK 01:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Since the shorts are before the series proper, they should be listed first. Much like List of Star Wars Rebels episodes. If the shorts came after the first episode aired, then their location in the article could be discussed. We should be presenting to the reader chronological info as much as we can. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 20:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
continuity-wisehas little determining factor in the placement of the tables. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 02:41, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Firstly the lead section makes a spurious claim of this show being a first for young audiences. Just because a Disney press release says something doesn't mean this encyclopedia needs to regurgitate it, Wikipedia articles are not supposed to be written like an {{
advert}}. It is
WP:UNDUE to highlight this
WP:PUFFERY in the lead section. Even if it was true on a technically (by finding some excuse to ignore
Ewoks (TV series) and the many other Star Wars animated shows targeted at young audiences) it is nonetheless unnecessary for this _encyclopedia_ to highlight such a trite claim. It is typical of marketing to split hairs so that they can claim a "first" and it is beneath this encyclopedia to repeat such a silly claim. Why does anyone believe this dodgy claim of first is so important as to need to be highlighted in the lead section of an encyclopedia article? (
WP:LEAD should "summarize the most important points"
)
Secondly the article body verbosely not only repeats this press release verbiage (instead of taking a neutral point of view and getting on with the bare facts of the announcement) and calls it a first for "young audiences and their families" which if it really needs to be stated at all is more vague than the actual source which more clearly specified that it was targeted at a preschool audience. If encyclopedia article really must keep this spurious claim at all, it would be considerably better if it was less {{ vague}} and more specific about it. -- 109.79.167.126 ( talk) 02:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Star Wars: Young Jedi Adventures article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BaldiBasicsFan, a section for you to discuss your bold edits, and to show supporting consensus and/or guidelines. Cheers. -- Alex_21 TALK 01:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Since the shorts are before the series proper, they should be listed first. Much like List of Star Wars Rebels episodes. If the shorts came after the first episode aired, then their location in the article could be discussed. We should be presenting to the reader chronological info as much as we can. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 20:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
continuity-wisehas little determining factor in the placement of the tables. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 02:41, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Firstly the lead section makes a spurious claim of this show being a first for young audiences. Just because a Disney press release says something doesn't mean this encyclopedia needs to regurgitate it, Wikipedia articles are not supposed to be written like an {{
advert}}. It is
WP:UNDUE to highlight this
WP:PUFFERY in the lead section. Even if it was true on a technically (by finding some excuse to ignore
Ewoks (TV series) and the many other Star Wars animated shows targeted at young audiences) it is nonetheless unnecessary for this _encyclopedia_ to highlight such a trite claim. It is typical of marketing to split hairs so that they can claim a "first" and it is beneath this encyclopedia to repeat such a silly claim. Why does anyone believe this dodgy claim of first is so important as to need to be highlighted in the lead section of an encyclopedia article? (
WP:LEAD should "summarize the most important points"
)
Secondly the article body verbosely not only repeats this press release verbiage (instead of taking a neutral point of view and getting on with the bare facts of the announcement) and calls it a first for "young audiences and their families" which if it really needs to be stated at all is more vague than the actual source which more clearly specified that it was targeted at a preschool audience. If encyclopedia article really must keep this spurious claim at all, it would be considerably better if it was less {{ vague}} and more specific about it. -- 109.79.167.126 ( talk) 02:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)