Is the quote from Kathleen Kennedy needed? Can it be changed to "In December, Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy said that the film had not been mapped out and..."?
The sentence starting with "Abrams is an executive producer" seems out of place. Maybe change it to "Additionally, Abrams served as an executive producer".
Starting that same sentence with "In November 2014, Ivan Dunleavy, chief executive of Pinewood Studios, confirmed" seems misleading as the last part was from December 2015 and was said by Kathleen Kennedy. I suggest rewording, splitting, or just moving the last part farther down in #Filming.
Is "In September 2015, del Toro revealed that principal photography would begin in March 2016;[44] Kennedy later said filming would begin in January 2016.[7]" necessary? Both sentences contradict themselves, making it harder for readers, and the point is already made in the next paragraph.
Bringing the Spanish source back change "at the Salar de Uyuni salt flats in Bolivia.[60]" to "at the Salar de Uyuni salt flats in Bolivia.[60] Additional filming took place in Mexico.[61]"
See
here and
here. I restored the refs, but I bundled them. See
WP:CITEBUNDLE and
WP:Citation overkill. I think the reviewer meant WP:Citation overkill, not WP:OVERLINK. WP:OVERLINK isn't about refs. The refs aren't redundant. They are there so that that the sentences are fully verified. If we say "several reviewers" and only have one reviewer supporting the sentence, that leaves the sentence somewhat unverified. There's also a
WP:Hidden note in the section showing that the section was crafted after a lot of discussion.
ReaperRoe (
talk)
18:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
I'm saying that the same reference is listed more than once (you can find the citation from Ian Youngs in #References five times). You can simply fix this with a better cite bundle using something like <ref name="Youngs"/> multiple times. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk?20:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Is the quote from Kathleen Kennedy needed? Can it be changed to "In December, Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy said that the film had not been mapped out and..."?
The sentence starting with "Abrams is an executive producer" seems out of place. Maybe change it to "Additionally, Abrams served as an executive producer".
Starting that same sentence with "In November 2014, Ivan Dunleavy, chief executive of Pinewood Studios, confirmed" seems misleading as the last part was from December 2015 and was said by Kathleen Kennedy. I suggest rewording, splitting, or just moving the last part farther down in #Filming.
Is "In September 2015, del Toro revealed that principal photography would begin in March 2016;[44] Kennedy later said filming would begin in January 2016.[7]" necessary? Both sentences contradict themselves, making it harder for readers, and the point is already made in the next paragraph.
Bringing the Spanish source back change "at the Salar de Uyuni salt flats in Bolivia.[60]" to "at the Salar de Uyuni salt flats in Bolivia.[60] Additional filming took place in Mexico.[61]"
See
here and
here. I restored the refs, but I bundled them. See
WP:CITEBUNDLE and
WP:Citation overkill. I think the reviewer meant WP:Citation overkill, not WP:OVERLINK. WP:OVERLINK isn't about refs. The refs aren't redundant. They are there so that that the sentences are fully verified. If we say "several reviewers" and only have one reviewer supporting the sentence, that leaves the sentence somewhat unverified. There's also a
WP:Hidden note in the section showing that the section was crafted after a lot of discussion.
ReaperRoe (
talk)
18:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
I'm saying that the same reference is listed more than once (you can find the citation from Ian Youngs in #References five times). You can simply fix this with a better cite bundle using something like <ref name="Youngs"/> multiple times. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk?20:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply