This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles
The "Technology and effects" section is not properly sourced
It looks like it's being sourced to a personal video blog on YouTube which may not qualify under
WP:RS. Any objections before I remove that section for a WP:V and WP:RS violation? --
Coolcaesar (
talk)
19:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)reply
I agree with this assessment. The owner of the YouTube channel has no direct affiliation with Disney or Disney Imagineering. The about section of the channel states, "Information shared will not always be 100% accurate and is based off of the aforementioned research, investigation, observation and extrapolations based on familiarity, inference and experience. Amusement Labs is not affiliated in any manner or capacity with the companies presented and should not be interpreted as so." This statement shows clear evidence of not qualifying under
WP:RS and the section should be updated to use reliable sources or removed until reliable information can be sourced. --
Chadwpalm (
talk)
19:36, 24 June 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles
The "Technology and effects" section is not properly sourced
It looks like it's being sourced to a personal video blog on YouTube which may not qualify under
WP:RS. Any objections before I remove that section for a WP:V and WP:RS violation? --
Coolcaesar (
talk)
19:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)reply
I agree with this assessment. The owner of the YouTube channel has no direct affiliation with Disney or Disney Imagineering. The about section of the channel states, "Information shared will not always be 100% accurate and is based off of the aforementioned research, investigation, observation and extrapolations based on familiarity, inference and experience. Amusement Labs is not affiliated in any manner or capacity with the companies presented and should not be interpreted as so." This statement shows clear evidence of not qualifying under
WP:RS and the section should be updated to use reliable sources or removed until reliable information can be sourced. --
Chadwpalm (
talk)
19:36, 24 June 2021 (UTC)reply